Policy & Planning

“Delay-mongers:” Climate boss Kean lashes nuclear supporters

Published by

Nuclear power will take too long to implement and increase energy costs, a government climate change leader says, accusing advocates of delaying the transition to renewables.

The federal opposition has promised to build nuclear reactors at the sites of coal-fired power stations if it wins the next election, though it has not yet revealed the costs.

Climate Change Authority chair and former NSW Liberal treasurer Matt Kean has lashed his ex-colleagues’ policy and says Australia cannot pander to vested interests and self-serving groups who “want to delay clean and cheap energy seemingly to benefit their own careers or profits at the expense of the environment, economy and people”.

“The ‘delay-mongers’ have latched onto nuclear power despite the overwhelming evidence that it can only drive up energy bills, can only be more expensive and can only take too long to build,” he said in an address at the Australian Financial Review’s Climate and Energy Summit on Tuesday.

“Even those arguing for nuclear don’t believe we’ll ever build one of these reactors in Australia … but they get their grabs in the news.”

Under the coalition’s proposal, would be built in Lithgow and the Hunter Valley in NSW, the Latrobe Valley in Victoria, Port Augusta in South Australia, Collie in Western Australia and Callide and Tarong in Queensland.

Speaking at the same event, opposition energy spokesman Ted O’Brien defended his party’s nuclear plan and maintained it would work as part of an energy mix with renewables and gas.

“Our plan is to replace coal … with zero-emissions nuclear energy, bringing Australia in line with the world’s most advanced economies,” he said.

The first reactor would be built within 10 to 12 years, with the remainder to be operational from the 2040s if the coalition wins government in 2025.

But the biggest cost of nuclear energy is time, Mr Kean said, and that is something neither the environment nor the economy can afford.

“It would once again plunge Australia back into indecision and delay,” he said.

“We simply can’t afford to wait and hope that bigger breakthroughs are over the horizon.”

Source: AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Swiss commodity trader gets approval to buy Zen retail business and PPA deals. Will it take on Big 3?

One of the world's biggest commodity traders moves into Australia electricity retail business - competition…

26 June 2026

Judge dismisses legal bid to prevent gas fracking in the Top End

Activists have lost their court bid to prevent gas exploration in the Northern Territory after…

26 June 2026

Nuclear reactors taken offline in France, as extreme heat pushes river temperatures into danger zone

EDF has taken nearly 10% of its nuclear power capacity offline this week, to avoid…

26 June 2026

South Australia swings from three days of 100 pct renewables to worst drought in 7 years

South Australia just experienced its worst wind drought in seven years. The fleet of short-duration…

26 June 2026

“Not consulted:” Local councils in the dark on LNP plan to “scrap” huge renewable zone and “evaporate” benefits

Local government leaders say they were in the dark over state Coalition plans to revise…

26 June 2026

Solar Insiders Podcast: Virtual networks and the real pursuit of energy democracy

Deakin University's Andrea La Nauze on the early findings from an Australia-first trial of technology…

26 June 2026