Policy & Planning

“Delay-mongers:” Climate boss Kean lashes nuclear supporters

Published by

Nuclear power will take too long to implement and increase energy costs, a government climate change leader says, accusing advocates of delaying the transition to renewables.

The federal opposition has promised to build nuclear reactors at the sites of coal-fired power stations if it wins the next election, though it has not yet revealed the costs.

Climate Change Authority chair and former NSW Liberal treasurer Matt Kean has lashed his ex-colleagues’ policy and says Australia cannot pander to vested interests and self-serving groups who “want to delay clean and cheap energy seemingly to benefit their own careers or profits at the expense of the environment, economy and people”.

“The ‘delay-mongers’ have latched onto nuclear power despite the overwhelming evidence that it can only drive up energy bills, can only be more expensive and can only take too long to build,” he said in an address at the Australian Financial Review’s Climate and Energy Summit on Tuesday.

“Even those arguing for nuclear don’t believe we’ll ever build one of these reactors in Australia … but they get their grabs in the news.”

Under the coalition’s proposal, would be built in Lithgow and the Hunter Valley in NSW, the Latrobe Valley in Victoria, Port Augusta in South Australia, Collie in Western Australia and Callide and Tarong in Queensland.

Speaking at the same event, opposition energy spokesman Ted O’Brien defended his party’s nuclear plan and maintained it would work as part of an energy mix with renewables and gas.

“Our plan is to replace coal … with zero-emissions nuclear energy, bringing Australia in line with the world’s most advanced economies,” he said.

The first reactor would be built within 10 to 12 years, with the remainder to be operational from the 2040s if the coalition wins government in 2025.

But the biggest cost of nuclear energy is time, Mr Kean said, and that is something neither the environment nor the economy can afford.

“It would once again plunge Australia back into indecision and delay,” he said.

“We simply can’t afford to wait and hope that bigger breakthroughs are over the horizon.”

Source: AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Build it and they will come: The urgent grid upgrades WA needs to quit coal and power green industry

Western Australia risks losing jobs and investment in its two most prized industrial regions without…

10 September 2026

Households tipped to spend $85 billion on energy upgrades, but renters and young Australians could miss out

Spending on home energy upgrades such as insulation and solar panels is on the rise…

9 September 2026

“Overlooked” challenge: Data centre boom could lift e-waste load 10-fold, increase “forever chemical” risks

Environmental authorities will be faced with a wave of new e-waste as data centre industry…

9 September 2026

“Australian first” grid-connected sodium-sulfur battery powers up, just as supplier halts production

Australia’s first grid-connected, industrial-scale sodium-sulfur battery will support materials processing plant and demonstrate novel long-duration…

9 September 2026

Massive and unprecedented injection of power as Super Battery tests its full shock-absorber capacity

Australia's most powerful battery injects a massive and unprecedented amount of power into the grid…

9 September 2026

Too old, can’t dance: New numbers show Yallourn is ready to retire

Report says Yallourn is old and clunky and ready to retire, and replacing it gas…

9 September 2026