During a climate change summit in San Francisco in Sept 2018, former California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a bill to make the state’s electricity sector carbon free by 2045.
Coming at the end of his last term in office, however, he decided to go a step further by signing an Executive Order to make the state’s economy carbon neutral by the same deadline.
But the debate about how best to get to that target, and at what cost, started much earlier since California has been contemplating to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels while increasing its renewable portfolio for some time.
The general consensus has always been that the going gets progressively tougher, and more expensive, as one gets closer to the end target – once the low hanging fruit has been exhausted.
Some observers have proposed a more gradual approach, extending the deadline farther back while others have argued for an accelerated approach.
Path to a 100% renewables in California, a white paper published in early May 2020 by Wartsila, a Finnish consulting firm, proposes a new path that, it claims, would enable California to meet its goal of 100% clean electricity by 2040, i.e., 5 years ahead of schedule.
Furthermore, the white paper claims that compared to the current plans, its path would save billions of dollars by relying, among other things, on flexible thermal generation that can run on carbon-neutral fuel produced from the excess solar and wind energy.
Rather than facing the increased frequency and duration of renewable curtailments, California can turn the wasted energy into green fuels, which can substitute for the current fleet of natural gas fired plants.
According to the grid operator, CAISO, renewable curtailments have already topped the 1,000,000 MWh mark as of late May 2020.
The state has been adding utility-scale solar plants as well as 9,269 MW of installed behind-the-meter solar capacity, which are mostly responsible for the curtailments.
The Wartsila study compares 3 potential pathways, all meeting the mandatory 60% renewable mix by 2030:
Warstila is not alone.
Many who study the future of carbon-free electricity systems in Europe and elsewhere are convinced that an efficient thermal fleet using green fuels produced by power- to-gas from the excess renewables coupled with gas storage and delivery systems is much better suited to serves as a gigantic long-duration battery.
Fuel produced by PtG can be stored in large quantities for long periods of time, days, weeks, months or longer – something that batteries cannot do, and there is no leakage.
According to Warstila in such a scenario, the thermal power plants become the inverters (visual above), using the stored renewable energy and converting it back to carbon-free electricity.
Traditional storage such as pumped hydro storage or batteries can handle short-term; while PtG coupled with the thermal fleet provides longer-term balancing, e.g., intra-seasonal.
The same plants can provide reliability and back-up services, e.g., by generating during extended periods when there is no solar &/or wind for days or weeks.
Fereidoon Sioshansi is president of Menlo Energy Economics and founder and editor of EEnergy Informer. Reproduced with permission.
In a decision Woodside says is "not particularly" related to America's new fossil fuel focus,…
A social media post featuring a fake news report is spreading a false claim about…
As Trump confirms plans to "drill baby, drill" Santos hits pause on a $3bn-plus oil…
Marinus Link has narrowed the field for who will build the onshore infrastructure to two…
Vena Energy says it has completed Australia's largest utility-scale hybrid renewable facility with a single…
Developer Quinbrook Infrastructure starts the year with the biggest ever funding deal for a battery…