Home » Commentary » “Ugly duckling” wind turbine from GE could produce some beautiful numbers

“Ugly duckling” wind turbine from GE could produce some beautiful numbers

CleanTechnica

GE has been quietly working on a radical new wind turbine design for a good two years, and now that the company is finally ready to let the cat out of the bag, we can see why it’s been playing it close to the vest. The new design looks like somebody snuck up behind a standard wind turbine and slapped a 20,000 pound clown nose on its face. It’s funny-looking all right, but the new turbine — which some have dubbed the “big-nosed wind turbine” — is up and running at a test site in California and we’re dying to see what the data show.

To gild the lily, GE has parked the new big-nosed wind turbine on top of its new Space Frame wind turbine tower, so let’s take a look at both.

GE-ecoROTR-big-nose-wind-turbine

The New Big Nosed Wind Turbine From GE

We have another four months to die because that’s how long the data collection phase for the prototype is going to take, but in the meantime, GE has been forthcoming with an R&D timeline for the new big-nosed wind turbine.

The new wind turbine actually has a name and it’s not “big-nose.” It’s ecoROTR. The idea is to put a dome over the middle of the turbine, where the blades would normally meet. In theory, that lets you milk more energy out of the same amount of wind.

Here’s how GE stacks up the comparison with standard wind turbines:

When wind hits the center of the wind turbine where the blades are attached, it’s wasted. That’s because the blades are basically levers and the same wind generates more force further from the hub.

So far, so good on the test phase. The design started with a styrofoam ball, some toothpicks, and a thorough round of testing at GE’s wind tunnel lab in New York.

The tests indicated the potential for a 3% improvement in performance, which doesn’t seem all that spectacular on an individual basis. However, GE points out that when you tote up the savings from a modern wind farm — and today’s wind farms tend to be gigantic — the numbers add up to a tasty pile.

Anyways, that was enough to justify a small-scale prototype for testing, and those results were satisfying enough for the development of the full-scale dome.

GE is certainly not horsing around with this phase of the testing process. The dome measures 60 feet in diameter and does indeed weigh 20,000 pounds. GE selected a 1.7 megawatt turbine, which is not the most powerful in its lineup (that would be the 3.2 designed for high-speed winds), but it is powerful enough to make the point.

Size Matters

According to GE’s wind turbine product information, the blades for its 1.7–100 megawatt model turbine clock in at 48.7 meters, or almost 160 feet long. Blades for the 1.7–103 model are slightly longer, but you get the point — at half the length of a football field, turbine blades are a bear to transport and install.

In hard-to-access locations, that means you could have to cut new access roads and make other infrastructure adjustments, all of which adds to the cost of a new wind farm and undercuts the  advantage of wind over other power sources.

Even without the adjustments, wind turbine (and tower) transportation often involves local police escorts and other manpower for oversized loads, which adds to the final costs.

So, if the full-scale prototype pans out, keep your eyes peeled for the next iteration from GE. We’re guessing that it will be a component-based dome that can be assembled on site, with shorter blades that will be attached to the perimeter, and the whole thing will be designed for easy transportation — possibly in street-legal batches that don’t require escorts or other special considerations.

That brings us to the Space Frame wind turbine tower prototype. Last year, GE gave CleanTechnica a sneak peek at the new tower (yes, we got to climb to the top), which is base on the same idea: relatively small components that can be transported via existing infrastructure and assembled on site.

The whole thing looks like something you could put together from an Erector set, which is the point. If you take a look at that ecoROTR photo up above, you can see that the dome also lends itself to modular construction, with the frame covered by a lightweight cladding.

Here’s our view of the Space Frame tower from the inside, on the ground looking up:

GE-space-frame-wind-tower-turbine-2
Photo by Tina Casey.

The white stuff is a polyvinyl cladding that gives the Space Frame a couple of potential advantages over steel tube towers, aside from minimizing the use of steel. Notice, for one thing, that the access ladder is on the inside, which means that if you have to go up the ladder in bad weather, no worries (we went up the tower in a bucket, btw — but we did come down by the ladder).

The cladding also discourages birds from nesting in the tower, which could lead to many unfortunate accidents. GE is also figuring that the cladding makes the Space Frame look a little more like conventional wind turbine towers, which could come into play where aesthetics call for a more conventional look.

Space Frame + ecoROTR could be “the perfect couple” according to GE (add in this and you’ll get a threesome), so we’ll be sure to check back in a few months and see what the numbers show.

 

Source: CleanTechnica. Reproduced with permission.

Comments

6 responses to ““Ugly duckling” wind turbine from GE could produce some beautiful numbers”

  1. Pedro Avatar
    Pedro

    Simple and clever idea.

  2. Andrew Woodroffe Avatar
    Andrew Woodroffe

    Doesn’t Enercon also do this, to a modest extent, with their egg shaped nacelle and shoulders on the blade roots? And how would the umbrella work with multiple turbines?

    It is going to be interesting to see how this works out.

    Isn’t the issue with lattice towers bolt tightening?

  3. Chris Fraser Avatar
    Chris Fraser

    I’m not keen on that ladder. I’m not going up even in good weather …

  4. Alebert Gatsavson Avatar
    Alebert Gatsavson

    The next step will be to cover the “big nose” with solar panels!

  5. Philip Totaro Avatar
    Philip Totaro

    This technology is not necessarily new. Similar concepts have been previously studied, but never implemented. 3% AEP increase is unlikely in practice with this design, and LCOE impact would be negligible. Material costs with the additional head mass of the dome itself combined with structural reinforcements for the hub as well as alteration of the spinner negate most of the performance benefit. Rotor induction is not altered by this, only the channeling of flow from the less productive central portion of the rotor to the outboard sections. This alters the angle of incidence of the oncoming wind which will make it necessary to alter optimal pitch angle as well. Changing optimal pitch at rated will also reduce AEP from the rotor slightly, but the hope is that the increased flow on the outboard section (also slightly accelerated by the dome) will compensate. This technology in combination with a tailored blade that has an optimal pitch angle to work with the dome might provide more of a benefit, but applying this as some sort of “upgrade” to existing turbines is unlikely to provide the gains advertised. The design changes and tooling changes to the blade will also make this costly to implement.

  6. Jacob Avatar
    Jacob

    There are now bladeless turbines being built in Spain that cost 50% less than bladed turbines.

    Really quite revolutionary if they are feasible.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.