Rooftop solar saved NSW consumers nearly $1 billion in heatwave


An analysis of the big electricity price surges during the February heatwave in New South Wales suggests that rooftop solar on homes and businesses across the state likely reduced the market price of wholesale electricity by nearly $1 billion over three days.

The analysis by Marija Petkovic, of consulting firm Energy Synapse, says that without rooftop solar the total cost of market prices would have been $888 million higher, because peak demand during the heatwave, when temperatures soared to 45°C, would have been higher and longer.

Rooftop solar PV supplied only about 2 per cent of the state’s total power needs over that time – or about 17GWh – but its impact on the market was to cut the price of electricity by 60 per cent, delivering savings of $888 million.

Rooftop solar also likely delivered considerable savings in markets in Queensland and South Australia over the same period, although Petkovic says she has not crunched the numbers on those states, and there are many other factors to consider.

For example, given the huge amount of rooftop solar in Queensland – 1.72GW according to the Clean Energy regulator, more than the biggest coal-fired power station in the state – there would likely be another power station built if the rooftop solar wasn’t there.

Certainly though, the experience of the network owners and the grid operators in states like South Australia and Western Australia is that the high penetration of rooftop solar has done what Petkovic has identified in NSW – it has pushed the peak further into the evening, and reduced the breadth of it.

It also adds to the considerable benefits of rooftop solar during heatwaves, a time when Australia’s electricity networks are at their most vulnerable. While coal and gas plants in NSW, Queensland and South Australia tripped or failed to operate to capacity due to heat-related problems, rooftop solar performed exactly as expected.

So much so that the NSW government has said rooftop solar played a crucial role in keeping the lights on in the state, when the heatwave pushed the grid to its limits. Only the Tomago aluminium smelter had to suffer a forced outage.

The Petkovic analysis also highlights another issue with rooftop solar and the way it is compensated. Despite saving $888 million, the actual “market value” of the rooftop solar put into the grid was only around $9.6 million, or $550/MWh. Householders would have been lucky to receive 8c/kWh, or $80/MWh, for their output. Many would have received less.

This issue was highlighted in an earlier story “NSW rooftop solar saved the day but householders got paid a pittance”, quoting analyst Dylan McConnell, from Melbourne’s Climate and Energy College, who said rooftop solar clearly played a major role in reducing stress on the grids in Queensland and New South Wales, and kept a cap on prices. But got little reward.

So how did Petkovic arrive at her numbers? “The interesting question to me was how would the electricity market cope if there was no small solar?” she writes in a post on LinkedIn. “This is difficult to quantify, but my attempt considered three factors:

  1. What would electricity demand in NSW look like if the generation from small solar had to be met by the market. Data published by the Australian PV Institute was used for this analysis.
  2. Given this new demand profile, what would the 30 minute electricity price be in the wholesale market. To develop the likely set of prices without small solar, the 5 min bid stacks published by AEMO were examined for each period where small solar was generating power.
  3. What would be the cost to the market with small solar (i.e. the actual cost that was incurred) vs the cost without small solar (i.e. the estimate derived from 1 & 2).

nsw solar 1

This graph above shows the data for February 9 to 11. The light green shading shows the actual electricity demand that was seen by the market, while the dark green shading shows the estimated generation from small solar PV.

The effect of small solar on all three days was to reduce the length of peak demand and to push the peak to later in the afternoon.

The black line is the actual 30 minute pool price that was seen in the NSW wholesale market. The grey line, says Petkovic, is the pricing that would have resulted if the power generated by small solar had to be met by the market, assuming that bidding behaviour remained the same.
“Under these conditions, the effect of small solar was to significantly depress pricing in the wholesale market,” she writes. “Furthermore, it is likely that AEMO would have called for involuntary load shedding during the afternoon of Friday February 10, as there were periods with not enough generation bids to meet the extra demand that small solar was covering.”

NSW solar 2

So how much money would have been saved? The second graph shows the total electricity cost without small-scale solar (dark green) and the total electricity cost with small-scale solar (light green).

“Over the three-day period, small solar reduced the cost to the market by roughly $888 million,” Petkovic writes. “Even though small solar only covered 2 per cent of electricity demand, it cut the price of electricity by 60 per cent from an estimated volume weighted average price of $1920/MWh to $780/MWh.”

Could such figures be replicated in other states? Petkovic says possibly, but it is difficult to say if it would happen to the same extent.

“The issue with Queensland is that there is so much rooftop solar. If that solar wasn’t there, there would almost certainly be another generator in the market. This introduces significantly more uncertainty into the analysis and I wanted to be careful not to overstate the benefits.”

However, as we reported in February based on McConnell’s analysis, there is no doubt that rooftop solar delayed the peak in that state, and it wasn’t until rooftop solar started to wind down that the state’s gas generators were able to wield their market power, and push prices higher, as this graph shows.

qld solar price

The irony out of all this is that even though the network operators have admitted that rooftop solar narrows and delays the peak, they and the big retailers have fought against higher feed-in tariffs because they say the peak is not actually removed.

This sort of analysis underlines the benefits of rooftop solar. It is removing the ability of gas generators to set the price as high as they might otherwise, as well as providing perfectly reliable generation in the middle of the heatwave, when the fossil fuel generators were breaking under the stress of the heat. In short, they helped to keep the lights on.

In the meantime, the majority of solar households now on new “market” tariffs are receiving only the estimated average wholesale price of electricity over a year. That has meant a jump in NSW to between 11c and 14c/kWh, from July 1, and the inclusion of climate benefits with a defacto carbon price in Victoria.

But still, there are no network benefits – and only those households which are signed up with software providers such as Reposit, Redback and others, are able to tap into variations in market price.


14 responses to “Rooftop solar saved NSW consumers nearly $1 billion in heatwave”

  1. john Avatar

    Once storage batteries are installed on a large percentage of those solar households then the peak in the evening will go down as well at that stage total disruption to the business model used by generators will come under severe pressure.
    The outcome of this will be that wind, solar and small scale solar with storage will become the main system of power generation.

    Yes of course it will take a very large take up of the technology before this threshold is reached, however that is the direction headed.

    1. Chris Fraser Avatar
      Chris Fraser

      The batteries may need to have large capacities to cool down a house well into the evening. After a hot day, brick veneer house with no shading is likely to be suffering for a long time with hot bricks giving back their stored heat.

      1. hydrophilia Avatar

        Or work to match the production curve: chill your house more during peak solar production so you don’t need to do as much later.

        1. solarguy Avatar

          I precool or preheat. As long as the PV is able to match the AC load or better as well as running other essential loads, that strategy works well. If you have a half decent battery and split AC’s you can adjust the thermostat up or down, so it just ticks over. The trick is, as the PV output falls off is not to turn off the AC if on those nights that are going to continue to be hot, turning it back on will draw more current, hence more power. The first hour of an AC starting up always uses the most energy.

          1. juxx0r Avatar

            “The first hour of an AC starting up always uses the most energy.”


      2. Brian Tehan Avatar
        Brian Tehan

        I have a quote to retrofit wall insulation to a 130 sq metre 1991 brick veneer home I purchased last year. $3600 seems like a very good investment. It would be worth it for government to kick in some money, in the form of some kind of RET, to reduce the amount of peak power required.

        1. George Darroch Avatar
          George Darroch

          What kind of insulation is that? I’m not yet a homeowner, but brick/concrete houses are usually significantly less than wooden or cladded housing. The ability to retrofit insulation at low cost would make them more interesting to me.

          1. Brian Tehan Avatar
            Brian Tehan

            It’s called Insulbloc – small cubes of polystryrene, that are blown in. There is other fibre type bulk insulation that’s supposed to work similarly but bulk insulation must settle to some extent. The Insulbloc is supposed to be R6 in a brick veneer house, which seems a bit high to me. If it’s at least R3 instead of the current R0.4 or R0.5 (different sources), I will be very happy.

  2. Kevfromspace Avatar

    Now that we’re rounding $888m to $1b I guess that means I’ve just crept into the next tax bracket. Damnit!

    1. Kevin J. Rice Avatar

      I would like to round my income down to $1 for tax purposes. Plus, I can tell my teenagers that when they ask for money for something. Usually it’s just, “here’s a chore you can do for cash”, but claiming poverty might stop the complaints about how onerous the chores are vs. low payouts to them.

  3. Mags Avatar

    $1billion saved by consumers, that’s $1billion not going to the encumbants. Pretty clear why the encumbants are fighting renewables tooth and nail isn’t it?

  4. mushalik Avatar

    If load shedding had started earlier in the day, there would have been some real damage to the Tomago aluminium smelter. Details are in this post on my website:

    14 Feb 2017
    NSW’s privatized giveaway coal plant causes load shedding in extreme weather

  5. David Mitchell Avatar
    David Mitchell

    I know it is fashionable to bang on about low prices for solar FITs, but in NSW at least, many of these solar systems will have been installed with a 66c/kWh FIT for 6 years plus up to a 5x REC multiplier. They will have been well and truly paid off.

    To now want to be paid a “premium” price FIT because of high market prices, plus network benefits, plus time of use, plus low CO2 seems to forget that the owners of these systems have been helped into the market with very generous public support. Maybe it’s time to give back a little, by helping to reduce the prices for all those that don’t have solar. if you don’t like the price, don’t export.

    For those recently installed solar systems, you are receiving the cost benefit of the early adopters uptake and you know exactly the financial metrics. This is not to say that I don’t support a fair FIT for solar and I recognise that individual owners have relatively small market power. If you want better value for your product, then make it more valuable. Aggregate, cooperate, buy a battery, but don’t whinge that the “guvverment” should be looking after you. That’s exactly what we hate about the entrenched fossil fuel industries.

  6. Glenne Drover Avatar
    Glenne Drover

    Possibly the $1B is based on the spot prices, which only apply to the small amount of electricity that was not pre-hedged? And for the unhedged there are CAPS usually around $300/MWh that cover most of the rest? Not much settles at more than that does it?

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.