Regulator wants to slash Victoria solar tariff by 20 per cent

Victorian energy regulator the Essential Services Commission has recommended that the minimum feed-in-tariff paid for surplus rooftop solar output fed back into the grid be cut to 5c/kWh from the current level of 6.2c/kWh in 2016.

The recommendation, included in a report released this week, suggest that the falling cost of wholesale electricity prices – coincidentally the result of reduced demand and increased renewable energy – justifies the cut.

This graph illustrates the findings of the ESC and how it got to its numbers.

victoria FiT

The forecast average pool price is self explanatory. The value of PV is higher because of when the electricity is generated (in the middle of the day), and rooftop solar is credited with avoiding line losses (5 per cent of electricity generated from centralised plants never make it to the customer). And there is a small sum for avoided “market and ancillary fees”

The solar industry has long criticised pricing regulators in Australia of estimating only the avoided costs of rooftop solar and not crediting it with any benefits.

For intance, apart from avoided line losses, there is no credit for network benefits, or environmental benefits. The contrast with some US states, where pricing regulators put the “fair” solar tariff at close to the retail price, is striking.

The ESC itself says that – like other Australian regulators – it does not include “any savings in relation to the following types of costs when quantifying the FiT: network costs, hedging costs, green scheme costs and retailer costs.”

The solar lobby says this is not good enough.
“The Victorian Government should reject any recommendation by the electricity price regulator to unfairly reduce the state’s solar feed-in tariff,”  the Solar Citizens group said in a statement.
“Families have made the move to solar to take back control of their power bills, a reduced tariff would make it so much harder for them.
“Victorians have been among the biggest adopters of solar, which is why the State Government needs to do more to support existing homeowners with solar and to help more households install solar on their rooftops.”
“The main driver behind power bill price rises is investment in network poles and wires, not solar homes.”
Victoria is predicted by the Australia Energy Market Operator to be one of the biggest adopters of battery storage in Australia, particularly for new solar homes. This is partly due to the structure of tariffs, such as the low FiTs that are paid in various states and in Victoria in particularly.
The ESC will make a final decision later this year. The new Labor government has promised an investigation into the “fair price”of solar.

Comments

19 responses to “Regulator wants to slash Victoria solar tariff by 20 per cent”

  1. lin Avatar
    lin

    I would argue that selling the power from my PV system to my neighbours at more than 5 times what they pay me for said power is not a “fair” price. The regulators (and the governments that install them) need to realise that unless the system is seen to be fair, customers will not stick around when alternatives become available, and the grid will become an expensive stranded asset instead of a useful tool for increasing efficiency and reducing costs of electricity provision.

    1. Rockne O'Bannon Avatar
      Rockne O’Bannon

      kudos to you for recognizing and emphasizing the relationship between a rate payer and a utility. Utilities need to pay attention to their long term interests better. If they devoted attention to solar power providers as suppliers AND customers, then everyone could benefit from changes in technology.

      There is no reason that innovation needs to be divisive. Utilities play a special role in society, and they are given special status by governments. They also have special responsibilities.

  2. Island fisher Avatar
    Island fisher

    I won’t object to the reduction on one condition, that the price we pay for power is also reduced by 20% and also the service charge levied by the Distribution companies and all their associated charges be reduced by the same amount. Not likely they will agree to that

  3. BsrKr11 Avatar
    BsrKr11

    https://reneweconomy.wpengine.com/2015/fraser-time-to-stop-paying-lip-service-to-climate-policies-27429 – it is unstoppable and these people have to get their heads out of the sand!

    this is one of the biggest opportunities since the industrial revolution, a new distributed power grid with increases in efficiencies across the board would radically alter the 20th century business model into something that can be sustained into the future…
    I hope the authorities get their heads out of the sand for you lose here, it is going to be hard to catch up and Australia will find itself at an incredible disadvantage

    1. nakedChimp Avatar
      nakedChimp

      they’re not being paid to get their head out of the sand, quite the opposite..

  4. Giles Avatar

    Alan Pears, from RMIT, asks me to post this comment on his behalf.

    Alan says:

    The ESC has stated the factors it has not considered in setting its latest PV feed-in price. Since it knew this when it made its last decision, the question of why ESC has failed to do research so that it could address those factors must be asked. Further, I still take the position that the FiT should be close to (or, for simplicity) equal to the retail price at the time of export. This is based on the logic that if we did not have artificial barriers to me selling my PV output to my neighbours via my own power cable, I could sell my exports to them at close to the retail price they would otherwise pay to an energy retailer. And a long lead thrown over the fence doesn’t cost much!

    An alternative would be to ask network operators what the real cost of me using the wires between me and my neighbours to deliver power to them would be: I might be prepared to pay them for that service if it was a reasonable price.

    And, as RenewEconomy has repeatedly asked: who gets the difference between the FiT and the retail price? It seems that energy retailer pays a small amount for power from my PV exports that they then sell to my neighbour for the full retail price without having to pay network charges. If this is correct, it is an outrageous rip-off.

    In the last pricing decision, the excuse that ESC is required to set a single feed-in price was used to ignore calls for a time-variable feed-in price. What research has been done by ESC since then to make a case for a change in its terms of reference so that it can propose a time of use FiT?

    It is time for the ESC and energy policy makers to start pro-actively working in the long term interests of consumers, and to ensure fair treatment of emerging competitors, not just prop up the incumbents.

    1. nakedChimp Avatar
      nakedChimp

      It is time for the ESC and energy policy makers to start pro-actively
      working in the long term interests of consumers, and to ensure fair
      treatment of emerging competitors, not just prop up the incumbents.

      That’s too naive for me..

      Also it’s starting to become their own long term interests – who is left being able to be regulated if 20-30% leave the grid in the next couple of years? The remainder won’t be able to support this kind of organization – did they ever think of that?

      1. MaxG Avatar
        MaxG

        Fully agree, too naive… profit over people has been the mantra for decades. The people should have stood up when privatisation was on the walls. 🙂
        As for grid defections, there is lots of talk, if it comes to doing it you’re lucky to see 2-3%… even this number is very doubtful at best.

    2. Miles Harding Avatar
      Miles Harding

      We still have dinosaurs in search of a tar pit!

      It would appear that the network operators refuse to contemplate the new order where the network has ceased to be a distributor from the few to the many and is becoming a broker between the many.

      I can think on nothing more likely to cause them serious problems, maybe even a death spiral, as consumers react to the increasingly biased system.

      1. MaxG Avatar
        MaxG

        Not to forget, it is the Australian people who elected these dinosaurs.

    3. Ron Horgan Avatar
      Ron Horgan

      Now leads over the fence is an idea I can grasp.
      Lots of panels, leads and lots of battery storage and the resilience of the entire system is suddenly greater than the hub and spoke model.
      Distributed energy by direct radiation.
      A bit of organization and the power monopolies can go burn coal.

  5. Farmer Dave Avatar
    Farmer Dave

    I think it is possible to turn this whole argument around. If it is decided that it would be a bad outcome for the grid to experience mass defections, then the price that should be paid to people for exporting their excess energy to the grid should be the price at which defections are kept to a reasonably low level. In other words, grid operators concerned to limit defections should carry out market research to find the price at which there is enough incentive to stay connected, and then that price should be offered. My guess is that if solar system owners were offered the going energy cost they pay less a discount for transporting the energy to their neighbours, they would say “that’s fair” and have an incentive to stay connected to the grid.

    It’s really all about objectives: are we trying to maximise the profits of the retailers, or are we trying to limit the number of people who defect from the grid?

    1. nakedChimp Avatar
      nakedChimp

      objective #1 is current rule, no doubt and it’s not we, it’s them optimizing profits – I’d probably do the same in their position, just a naked chimp after all 😉

    2. phred01 Avatar
      phred01

      this proposal will ensure there are going to be significant grid defections and as a whole any surpluses will not be available to help to reduce peak demand in summer

  6. Mike Dill Avatar
    Mike Dill

    Once again they avoid the external costs of polution, and the health effects from the coal plants that PV replaces. adding those back in brings the numbers back to the retail rate.

  7. Humanitarian Solar Avatar
    Humanitarian Solar

    There’s no need to design a solar system to export to the grid. It can be designed to maximise “self consumption” by where possible using the solar power immediately with appliances that are switched on in the house, then any additional power being saved in batteries for later on. Only once the batteries are full and any other additional household tasks are accomplished (like boosting the temperature of the solar hot water, running the pool pump, watering the garden, filling the header tank, playing a song to the dog) only then the solar system would export any unwanted power. No one is forcing people to export their power to the grid. It’s a choice.

  8. Humanitarian Solar Avatar
    Humanitarian Solar

    Why Export Tariffs are not an issue:
    Export Tariffs are only an issue for families with Grid-Connect Inverters. Solar Panels trickle power in slowly while human beings seem to consume in spikes of usage that often exceed what the solar panels are trickling in. Think of breakfast. When many people are having breakfast, the sun has already come up over the horizon. If the system has 2000 Watts of solar panels, due to various technical inefficiencies and the fact the sun is low in the horizon, the system is lucky to produce 1000 Watts during breakfast. The family walks into the kitchen at 730am, switches on the 2200 Watt kettle to make tea and coffee, gets the 1800 Watt toaster going and perhaps even turns a hotplate up to 2000 Watts to cook the eggs. So the total household electricity consumption just to make breakfast is 6000 Watts. The solar panels are producing 1000 Watts. Where does the other 5000 Watts come from??? In a grid-connect solar system this shortfall of immediate power needed comes from the grid and the Grid-Connect Inverters job role is getting the power from the grid. It is often very difficult explaining to people that even though the sun is shining during the daytime, most of the Grid-Connect solar systems power must first be trickled into the grid for a low export tariff and then the Grid-Connect Inverter effectively provides most of the immediate household electricity demand from the Grid. The Grid provides lots of power. Solar Panels only trickle power so when the household needs power any shortfall comes from the grid. For Grid-Connect families, its crucial what the balance of their export and import tariffs are, because their Grid-Connect Inverter is setup to continually buy and sell electricity in order to make the above mathematics work.
    Now lets consider the Hybrid Solar System that’s connected to the grid though has access to a few batteries. The family walks into the kitchen to switch on 6000 Watts as before and the solar panels are producing 1000 Watts as before, yet the Inverter/Charger now says where am I going to get the shortfall of 5000 Watts??? The Inverter/Charger is intelligent enough to follow your orders. You or your Solar Installer have programmed it what to do. If you wish to keep your batteries fully charged for emergency backup then you might program the Inverter/Charger to get the power from the Grid to keep your batteries 100% full. If the grid has been reliable you might be setup to get the 5000 Watt shortfall during breakfast from your batteries. Its no big deal as the sun may have been shining before you got up or your going to work and the sun/solar panels have plenty of time to catchup and recharge your batteries. So now you go to work and what’s happening? Whereas Grid-Connect people are powerlessly exporting their excess electricity to the grid for a small rate, the Hybrid Grid Inverter says to itself – there’s little power being consumed now and there’s excess leftover above the families immediate needs, so in this situation my master (the family) have told me to charge the batteries. So the sun fills up the batteries. The power is effectively worth whatever the family would have bought it from the grid (35 cents kWatt/hour or whatever) so the family is saving it away in the batteries. The family fights through traffic and arrives home at 6pm. If its summer the sun might still be cranking away though if its winter the sun may have set. So the inverter/charger says – now there is a shortfall as my family has switched everything on and the sun has gone down, where do I get the shortfall??? My master has told me not to buy power at 35 cents/kW hour from the grid so I must dip into my savings of power in the batteries. Depending on how many batteries the family have given their Inverter/Charger to play with, the Inverter/Charger may be able to dip into the batteries until 10pm then the Inverter/Charger says PARTY TIME, the grid is now at off peak electricity lets go to town to charge my batteries!!!
    If the family wasn’t generous in the provision of batteries, then perhaps the Inverter/Charger might only make it to 8pm before a low voltage alarm goes off triggering the inverter/charger to reluctantly begin supplying the house with electricity from the grid. However the Inverter/Charger doesn’t have to go into PARTY mode charging its batteries. If its intelligent it can simply supply the family with its power between 8 to 10pm at peak electricity tariffs then PARTY ON at 10pm to charge its batteries at whatever speed it wishes to.
    So in summary, the family are the master and the Inverter/Charger is the servant which dutifully gets the power from wherever its told to and when its told to and that could be – the solar array, the batteries, a windmill, a generator, the water turbine in the creek, limited only by how intelligent it is, how many different inputs can be connected to it and how many batteries it has to play with. Basic inverter/chargers can work with the solar array/batteries/grid and often automatically power up a generator, whereas more expensive Inverter/Chargers can work with multiple power sources. So for the Inverter/Charger, the feed in tariff is a small issue as it isn’t automatically tied to the grid and rarely uses the grid and only resorts to the grid when the family have told it to.

  9. Neil Frost Avatar
    Neil Frost

    I was of the opinion that people that have a solar system setup help with providing extra power to the grid in peak times. Why then would the tariff go down even more making people want to store extra power for there own use and not feed it to the grid when the grid needs it most. This makes no sence at all.

    1. Humanitarian Solar Avatar
      Humanitarian Solar

      The reason is people with solar who sell power need to compete with the cost of large scale power generation. Export tariffs can never approach import tariffs as the grid is an expensive network to maintain and possibly becoming more expensive per capita.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.