Let’s talk trash: Why energy could solve mounting waste problem

rsz_trash_mountain_by_kuschelmiezeEnergy-from-Waste (EfW) is a progressive solution to Australia’s growing waste management problem. Australian Ethical’s International Equities Portfolio Manager, Nathan Lim, explains

The problem today

Australia generates 48 million tonnes of trash a year. That is 2.2 tonnes per person and the amount we throw away each year is growing 40% faster than population growth, according to the Department of Sustainability (DoS). Fortunately, 60% of what we throw is recycled putting our recovery rate around the middle amongst developed nations.

The DoS highlights that Germany achieves a recovery rate of 91% despite generating more than double the trash per capita (4.6 tonnes) as Australia. In fact they identify seven European countries that have recovery rates in excess of 97%. They attribute this performance to:

“…directives prohibiting unsorted waste going to landfill and greater use of advanced waste processing and EfW facilities.”

EfW stands for Energy-From-Waste or incineration. In Germany, 14% of its municipal solid waste (MSW) is burned to make renewable electricity. In Australia, only 3% of our waste is recycled for its embodied energy. EfW, as it is practised overseas, is non-existent in Australia. Energy recovery here is primarily achieved via the harvesting of landfill gas to produce electricity, as well as a small amount from anaerobic digestion and a few cement kilns using old tyres as supplementary fuel.

What is EfW?

A few years ago we had the opportunity to visit a modern EfW facility owned by Covanta Holding Corporation. Their Essex facility converts 2,800 tons of MSW per day into baseload electricity for 45,000 homes. A remarkable aspect of the facility was despite the amount of garbage being collected daily; there was no foul smell. The use of negative air pressure pulls odor into the facility while simultaneously keeping the fires burning. In terms of emissions, a modern EfW facility, like the one at Essex, produce fewer emissions than from a natural gas-fired power station minimising local air pollutants. In fact, the German Ministry of the Environment reports that residential fireplaces emit 20 times more dioxins than an EfW plant.

Would it work here?

EfW technology is widely available, and there is nothing preventing its use in Australia. For example, New South Wales (NSW) generates 4.8 million tonnes of MSW per year with 43% of it landfilled. This landfilled MSW is sufficient feedstock to support a 2,800 ton facility that would already bring our national MSW recovery ratio up to about half of what Germany is currently achieving.

What would it cost?

We know that Covanta’s Essex contract allows it to collect US$150 per ton of MSW. The facility also earns revenue from the sale of electricity. The current contract was sufficient for the company to commit US$100 million in upgrades and increase its dividend. We believe this points to a strong economic contract for the company. Assuming this facility were operating in NSW and it received a credit for its electricity at $34 per megawatt hour (the average wholesale price in NSW last year), the equivalent contract price would be around $160 per metric tonne.

According to the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, in August 2011 the average gate fee over landfill sites surveyed in the Sydney region was $195 per tonne for mixed waste. Because landfill gate fees are so high, this suggests EfW could be economic in NSW based on Covanta’s overseas experience.

Part of a sustainable future

Besides potentially being cheaper, a modern EfW facility in Australia would also displace coal-fired power generation as it is capable of providing continuous supply. This would help to reduce our national carbon footprint.

Waste management is a perpetual problem that only gets bigger over time. The NSW government’s policy to divert 66% of waste from landfill is a good example of a progressive policy that has supported more sustainable solutions but to continue this drive we need new solutions. The success of some European countries to nearly eliminate MSW from landfills is a remarkable and achievable goal Australia should look to mirror. Too much valuable material is simply being buried and wasted that could otherwise go towards making ours a more sustainable society. EfW is part of this sustainable future.

Comments

16 responses to “Let’s talk trash: Why energy could solve mounting waste problem”

  1. Miles Harding Avatar
    Miles Harding

    I presume we are using ‘sustainable’ in the usual nonsense manner here.

    It would make far more sense to not generate the waste in the first place. Making the importers responsible for *recycling* (no landfill allowed) any goods they import would stop the short lived rubbish (looking at China, here) products that currently fill retailers shelves.

    The fact that the per-capita waste tonnage is increasing is pointing towards a combination of planned obsolescence, non-repairability and rampant over-packaging of goods at all levels.

    Burning the rubbish is hardly a sustainable practice.

    1. Oliver Scheidegger Avatar
      Oliver Scheidegger

      I agree, according to Covanta’s own Corporate Sustainability Report 2009/10 their EfW processes burn waste 35% comprised of fossil based carbon.

      There are many pros and cons when considering EfW and collecting methane from a well managed landfill.

      But Miles is correct, not generating the waste in the first place is the BEST solution. Everything else is just choosing the lesser evil.

    2. Emma Avatar
      Emma

      Agree, but, being realistic about the average person’s consumption of plastic crap, we’re never going to solve the waste problem. I see this solution as a better one that the oceans of microbeads, fish-shaped soy sauce containers and soft drink bottles floating in the middle of nowhere. If the technology is supported now, it will improve.

      1. david H Avatar
        david H

        Emma, I agree. Better late than never!

  2. david H Avatar
    david H

    Miles – Oliver, I agree, a great philosophy but where in the World is it working? Certain European countries banned landfill some years ago and that result in an immediate uptake of new EfW plants as the waste has to go somewhere.

    The 35% fossil based carbon that you mention is most likely from plastic film such as plastic supermarket bags. These can be recycled but at a cost and in Australia we all want a bargain!

    In terms of comparing the environmental impact of using landfill gas or a modern EfW plant, the EfW plant is light years ahead. Landfill gas is about 60% methane and the remainder can contain some very nasty elements.

    I think Nathan presents some sound facts but is Australia ready for EfW?
    The NSW EPA Energy from Waste Policy Statement although long overdue, provides well developed guidelines for EfW plant environmental requirements. However, a key requirement is that “community acceptance to operate such a process has been obtained.” In a country where the community has not been exposed to EfW plants and has a strong tradition of NIMBY, I don’t see too many EfW project getting off the ground.

    1. Guest Avatar
      Guest

      ♥❧♥❧♥❧I RECEIVED FIRST DRAFT OF $13000!@ak25:

      ,,,

      ➨➨➨➨http://RealCareNet.uk/let/home

    2. Nathan Lim Avatar
      Nathan Lim

      David. NIMBY is indeed a tough one. We even see it in solar projects despite their relatively less intrusive nature. Early community engagement will be key as well as a substantial investment in education. Not an easy path but given the magnitude of the growing problem, one worth exploring.

  3. Leah Avatar
    Leah

    I like the idea of EfW, but agree with some of the comments below. I also question sentences such as “displace coal-fired power generation”. Is this actually happening? I mean that’s the intention of all renewable/ alternative energy projects but from my understanding we are currently in surplus energy in NSW and are forecast to be for a while. Has any coal-fired power station actually been impacted by any of the alternative energy developments in NSW? Or Australia? Would love to know out of interest… thanks.

    1. Jonathan Prendergast Avatar
      Jonathan Prendergast

      So far the following NSW coal plants have been mothballed:
      – Wallerwarang – 1,000MW
      – Munmorah – 1,400MW

      Another 4 have been mothballed in other states.

      This is due to dropping demand for fired generation due to energy efficiency, solar and wind.

      1. Leah Avatar
        Leah

        That’s positive – thanks Jonathan!

    2. Nathan Lim Avatar
      Nathan Lim

      Thanks Jonathan! Picking up some of the vibe from the other comments, in regard to surplus generation we need to have some “planned obsolescence” for coal generation. For example, the US MATS regulation is leading to massive coal-fired closure in the US because it is too expensive for some plants to comply with the mercury limit rules. A clean burning EfW plant has lower emissions than a natural gas-fired plant which would fit nicely into a policy framework focused on emissions reductions. The RET debate is important, but we must not lose focus on the main game which is about getting our emissions intensity down quickly.

      1. Leah Avatar
        Leah

        Great – thanks for explaining Nathan!

      2. david H Avatar
        david H

        Great point Nathan. Here in NSW a new EfW plant would have to comply with the latest requirements of the POEO and EfW Policy Statement (and rightly so), which is far more demanding on environmental limits than what our fleet of aged coal fired power station currently work to.

  4. Alen T Avatar
    Alen T

    MfW is the lazy approach to dealing with our landfill problem. Let’s start with focusing on educating and promoting people to recycle, and by recycle I mean more effort than just one yellow bin for all recyclable. Germany for instance has separate bins for paper, plastic and glass (could be more, it’s been a while since I was last there).

    The attitude that you can just throw something out and someone else will take care of it is very wrong minded. If you tell people “your waste can now be ‘sustainably’ burned/disposed of” it’ll only discourage people from making an effort to change their behaviour.

    1. Nathan Lim Avatar
      Nathan Lim

      Hi Alen. The DoS report breaks down Germany’s MSW disposal as such:
      Direct landfill <1%. Recycled 46%. Composed 17%. Incineration with energy recovery 14%. Incineration without energy recovery 18%. While the German's are doing a great job in recycling what they can, ultimately 32% of its MSW is still incinerated. There is a lot of waste that does not lend itself to being easily recycled/composted that is proving difficult to deal with.

  5. Jane Avatar
    Jane

    Its really disappointing to see the misinformed comments here about this dirty energy technology that Europe is moving to away from in favor of zero waste solutions and a circular economy. Waste to energy incinerators are the most expensive and dirtiest form of energy production. They emit more carbon dioxide and mercury per unit of energy than coal. They are no climate change solution.They also waste finite resources that could be better used. For example you can save 26.4 times more energy from recycling PET bottles than from burning them. Its quite ironic that Covanta has been quoted as a leader in this technology. This company is being prosecuted all over the world for breaching pollution laws. This is no solution for Australia. It is a backwards step towards entrenched consumerism, more fossil fuel burning (plastic is a fossil fuel) and GHG’s, while undermining the recycling and composting sectors. Zero waste solutions provide more jobs, less pollution and toxics, sustainability and a safe climate future for our kids. There is nothing progressive about dirty waste to energy incinerators. Passing them off as renewable energy only steals scarce funds from real renewable energy technologies like solar wind and wave.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.