For every unsubstantiated political claim made about the National Energy Guarantee, there is an equal and opposite informed and balanced Twitter response.
Here is one, featuring RE regular and senior advisor to the Climate and Energy College at Melbourne University, Simon Holmes à Court, explaining to ABC TV’s The Drum why the NEG isn’t worth the Excel spreadsheet its modelling is printed on.
You can also read Simon here, on what the NEG will do, to large-scale wind, solar and even battery storage. Spoiler: it’s not good.
Two massive wind and battery projects are the latest referred to state's independent planning arbiter…
Plans for solar and battery microgrids in remote communities gets funding boost in wake of…
A team of Chinese and Swiss scientists has achieved the first functional validation that solar…
The tallest wind turbine in the world, reaching 365 metres at its tip, is about…
Updated: Victoria premier puts key transmission link on hold pending cost review, and promises no…
Coalition vows to"go after gas" and alleges massive corruption in renewables industry as party energy…