For every unsubstantiated political claim made about the National Energy Guarantee, there is an equal and opposite informed and balanced Twitter response.
Here is one, featuring RE regular and senior advisor to the Climate and Energy College at Melbourne University, Simon Holmes à Court, explaining to ABC TV’s The Drum why the NEG isn’t worth the Excel spreadsheet its modelling is printed on.
You can also read Simon here, on what the NEG will do, to large-scale wind, solar and even battery storage. Spoiler: it’s not good.
The bizarre planning rules that make fossil gas connections a default for new homes, and…
Tim Buckley from Climate and Energy Finance joins to discuss the good, bad and the…
Plans to construct a 400 megawatt, four-hour battery between two solar farms in north-east Victoria…
Australia's energy market operator should be split in two and transmission brought back under public…
Watch the webinar to explore whether Australia’s grid is being overbuilt or underfunded, and how…
While the global oil crisis has put the world’s best well laid plans on hold…