Three hours of free electricity sounds like a great deal, but Solar Sharer could leave some households paying more.
Energy Futures Network director and electrical engineer, Ty Christopher argues a good policy has been undermined by the way it was designed and regulated. He says higher daily supply charges and higher electricity prices outside the free period mean some households may need to shift hundreds of dollars’ worth of energy use just to break even.
Christopher argues the Australian Energy Regulator gave too much weight to “retailer viability” and not enough to the original goal of cutting consumers’ bills. He explains what went wrong, who might still benefit from Solar Sharer, and why consumers need to do the numbers very carefully before signing up.
Tom Geiser from Good Heat on the technologies to provide carbon-free industrial heat. Plus: LNP's…
Days apart, one Australian minister called for reduced dependence on fossil fuels, while another literally…
Swiss storage giant completes purchase of the project site for big four-hour battery, setting a…
Installation of the "golden" turbine is being hailed as a "huge milestone" for a wind…
A paddock of solar and an innovative converter could allow Visy to cut gas use…
Australian thermal storage developer takes full ownership of energy precinct that once proposed to host…