Solar Sharer exposes a fundamental problem with our energy system – protecting retailer revenues can take priority over cutting household bills.
Energy Futures Network director and electrical engineer, Ty Christopher argues a good policy has been undermined by the way it was designed and regulated. He says higher daily supply charges and higher electricity prices outside the free period mean some households may need to shift hundreds of dollars’ worth of energy use just to break even.
Christopher argues the Australian Energy Regulator gave too much weight to “retailer viability” and not enough to the original goal of cutting consumers’ bills. He explains what went wrong, who might still benefit from Solar Sharer, and why consumers need to do the numbers very carefully before signing up.
State-owned utility cuts full-year loss after lifting generation and collecting a one-off insurance payment for…
New report shows Germany generated as much solar energy by end of September as in…
Plans by the owner of Australia's biggest wind farm to build a new stand-alone battery,…
A new scorecard tracking progress of the renewable energy sector against government targets reveals a…
What happened 10 years ago to cause South Australia to go system black? And what…
A four-year grassroots campaign has transformed into a major ARENA-backed pilot to help up to…