Solar dawns on southern tea parties

Published by

The Equation

Competition in the electric utility industry came after a nationwide flood of nuclear power cost over-runs. History is now repeating in Georgia and Florida, where popular reaction against uneconomic nuclear power is in bright contrast with support for solar energy. I wrote last week that the utilities resistance to solar makes sense only to the incumbent utility with an old business model.

The costs of nuclear plants planned and under construction in Southeast states have been shielded from economic reality by a variety of state regulatory decisions. In Florida, the collection of funds for the proposed Levy nuclear plant in advance of construction, and years before any benefits, drew new legislation.

Now, in Georgia, where the Vogtle plant expansion was too expensive at $14 billion and costs have been marching higher, the Atlanta Tea Party is calling for reforms and fair access to solar energy.

The ex-monopoly

The two traditional reasons for a monopoly in electric service NO LONGER make sense:

  1. A single set of wires run through the streets is not the only way to deliver energy, and
  2. Power plants are no longer cheaper with ever-larger size.

With the sun shining on all customers, the utility company has competition without a second set of wires. Solar energy competes for revenues with the utility model, as does energy efficiency, and reforms are needed to make sense of this new reality. As for the economies of scale in the building of generating plants, that fell apart with the wholesale competition between natural gas-powered plants and nuclear plants over 20 years ago.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is taking comments today on streamlining the process for solar interconnections. UCS has submitted comments describing utilities’ reluctance to use the data available to accommodate more solar rooftops. But the bigger challenge to the old ways of thinking about customers access to competing energy choices requires a state-by-state process. When the push to open competition created reforms in some states during the 1990s, rooftop solar wasn’t as cheap as it is now.

This is going to get interesting. You can get a front row seat at your state public utility commission’s next meeting.

Michael Jacobs is a senior energy analyst with expertise in electricity markets, transmission and renewables integration work

This article was originally published on the Union of Concerned Scientists’ Equation blog. Reproduced with permission

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Australian green hydrogen startup signs deal to deliver its first large-scale electrolyser

An Australian startup promising to transform the economics of green hydrogen has celebrated its fifth…

4 July 2026

Zen Energy put into administration just days after regulatory approvals for sale and transfer

One of the leading lights of a new breed of renewable-energy based utilities placed into…

4 July 2026

Solar Sharer free power offer is being undermined by higher network charges and complex tariffs

Some households will use batteries, EV charging and behaviour change to make very good use…

3 July 2026

China battery giant launches major new push for “circularity” amid EV and home storage boom

China battery giant launches two major initiatives aimed at improving the sustainability of battery manufacturing,…

3 July 2026

Community battery rollout is way behind schedule, with only a quarter built on time

A report into the progress of the federal government's Arena-backed community battery rollout has revealed…

3 July 2026

One of Australia’s first solar and battery hybrid projects reaches financial close, confirming big shift in market

One of Australia's first solar and battery hybrid projects reaches financial close, confirming big shift…

3 July 2026