Other Good Stuff

US utility dumps nuclear plant, will invest $6bn in solar and batteries

Published by

Think Progress

This week, Duke Energy Florida announced that it will terminate all plans to build its Levy Nuclear Project.

A BROOKLYN NAVY YARD ROOFTOP COVERED WITH SOLAR PANELS, FEBRUARY 14. STATE OFFICIALS SAID INVESTMENTS IN RENEWABLE PROJECTS LIKE THIS ONE WILL HELP REPLACE THE POWER LOST WITH CLOSURE OF INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR PLANT. CREDIT: AP/MARK LENNIHAN

And as part of a deal with the Florida Public Service Commission, the company will instead invest $6 billion in solar energy, smart meters, and grid modernization as well as electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and a battery storage pilot program.

Duke’s move reflects global trends that see surging growth for solar power as prices plummet, while increasingly uncompetitive nuclear power stagnates.

Note that Duke’s investment in batteries and EV chargers are core strategies for increasing solar penetration.

Indeed, as Energy Secretary Rick Perry’s recent grid study explained, a fleet of vehicles or chargers can be used to shift load “in response to price signals or operational needs,” and in particular “vehicle charging could be shifted to the middle of the day to absorb high levels of solar generation and shifted away from evening hours when solar generation disappears and system net load peaks.”

Duke’s deal will include adding 700 megawatts (MW) of solar energy, which would, by itself, double total Florida solar capacity. Despite being called “the sunshine state,” Florida has historically lagged in solar investment.

But ongoing price drops have spurred other utilities in the state to start building 600 MW of their own new solar, which means Florida solar capacity will soon triple.

Meanwhile, new U.S. nuclear builds have stalled because the industry is so uneconomic that half of the country’s existing nuclear power plants are losing money.

Greentech Media’s Stephen Lacey reported last week that by year’s end “solar PV could rival global nuclear capacity,” and by 2022, it could double current nuke capacity.

As Lacey notes, however, actual electricity generation is what matters most — since nuclear plants run at full capacity far more of the time, they still greatly out-generate solar. For now.

Source: Think Progress. Reproduced with permission.

Recent Posts

Administrators call time on Whyalla Steelworks’ coal furnace “delusion,” hundreds of jobs to go

Administrators of Whyalla Steelworks abandon efforts to reboot the plant's coal-fired blast furnace, wiping out…

14 September 2026

UK group snaps up leading wind, solar and battery consultancy as part of Australian buying spree

UK-based asset management group buys prominent Melbourne consultancy specialising in wind and solar developments as…

14 September 2026

New wind and battery energy park, backed by super funds, proposed for south-east Queensland

Another wind and battery project proposed for south-east Queensland, despite pushback by state government and…

14 September 2026

Former Liberal leader appointed to Snowy Hydro board as market awaits another Snowy 2.0 reset

Former Liberal leader and ex AEMO system design boss appointed to Snowy Hydro board as…

14 September 2026

Should ageing coal generators be fed carrots or sticks? | Energy Insiders

Smart Energy Council CEO David McElrea on LNP ideology, how to close coal fired generators,…

14 September 2026

“Incredibly ambitious”: Electricity market reforms given express track by energy ministers

Plan by energy ministers to agree on the new design for the National Electricity Market…

14 September 2026