Regulator rejects SA network solar tariff proposal

Published by

The Australian Energy Regulator has rejected the proposal from the South Australia’s monopoly network operator, SA Power Networks, to add a $100 a year network surcharge for households with rooftop solar.

As we reported here in May, SAPN caused a furore in the Australian solar industry by proposing the surcharge in a submission to the AER, despite decisions by both the Queensland and West Australian governments – the owners of their respective networks – to back away from similar moves.

But the proposal was rejected by the AER, which said in a statement on Wednesday that it was “not satisfied” that the network had demonstrated that PV and non-PV retail customers had “sufficiently dissimilar load profiles.”

“Customers with micro-generation facilities — such as solar Photovoltaic — should not be treated any less favourably than customers without such facilities, but with similar load profiles,” the AER statement said, citing current national electricity rules.

“A PV specific tariff of the type proposed by SA Power Networks would therefore constitute less favourable treatment of retail
customers with micro-generation facilities,” it said.

SAPN had justified the proposal of the tariff by saying that solar households still needed as much power from the network at peak times as other users, even if they used less electricity from the grid during the day when the sun was shining.

But the AER ruling questioned the SA Power Networks’ focus on the peak load of the profile, only, and its use of a limited number of values extracted from extreme weather days.

It also criticised the lack of consideration of the load profile over a reasonable time period, across the range of seasons and varying times of the day, in order to demonstrate a difference in the load profiles.

The ruling also said that SA Power Networks had not given any consideration to the reasonable variation across the residential population’s load profile.

SA Power Networks now has 10 days to resubmit its 2015-16 pricing proposal, with the Solar Tariff and Social Tariff removed. It is also required to inserting a reference to the ability of customers to choose their meter service provider, and meter type when installing a PV system.

The AER will then assess the revised submission for compliance with the pricing principles and the 2015-20 distribution determination.

Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of Renew Economy and editor of its sister site, One Step Off The Grid . She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Chickens “coming home to roost” for next Victorian energy minister, whoever it might be

The coming three years will be exceptionally tough for Victoria's next energy minister, experts say.

28 October 2026

World’s biggest battery maker snags deal for new Australian project, sees “huge interest” in sodium tech

China battery giant reveals it has been selected as the tech partner for a major…

28 October 2026

Victoria Coalition promises quick review of transmission plans, as it soft pedals stance on renewables

Victoria's likely next energy minister seeks to woo clean energy summit, promising quick fire review…

28 October 2026

Andrew Forrest’s Fortescue signs first 3rd party supply deal for its giant Pilbara “green grid”

Andrew Forrest's Fortescue signs up owner of huge lithium mine as the first customer of…

28 October 2026

Wind and solar projects to be given revenue certainty in new market design to back 75 pct renewables target

Updated: A simplied version of the new national policy mechanism will be used to propel…

28 October 2026

WA wants more renewables, but that does not mean it needs more gas

W.A. should easily meet its 75 pct renewables target, but there is a big question…

28 October 2026