Featured

“Not aligned to Paris:” AGL concedes coal exit plans don’t meet climate goals

Published by

AGL Energy has conceded its controversial demerger plans are not consistent with Paris climate goals, despite a majority of shareholders indicating last year they would supporting a demerger only if it met climate targets.

The company’s scheme of arrangement – a 350 plus page document outlining the details of the proposed company split – appears to support many of the arguments pushed by tech billionaire Mike Cannon-Brookes, who is fiercely opposing the demerger.

The centrepiece of the strategy for the newly formed Accel Energy, which will operate the remaining coal generators, is to keep the Bayswater coal generator in NSW running until 2033, and the Loy Yang A brown coal generator as late as 2045.

“These commitments are not aligned to the goals of the Paris Agreement as at the date of this Scheme Booklet,” says AGL, which is Australia’s biggest polluter courtesy of those coal generators.

“However, they strike a balance between Australia’s current and future energy needs and the requirements to decarbonise without significantly impacting energy system reliability or affordability or shareholder value.”

This is the heart of the dispute between AGL and Cannon-Brookes, who last week spent $660 million snapping up a 11.3 per cent stake that could stop AGL get majority shareholder approval for the move.

Cannon-Brookes argues that the last unit of the remaining coal generators should be closed by 2035 at the latest, to be consistent with the Paris targets and to give it a chance of seizing the opportunities ahead of it.

He is also critical of AGL’s target of 2.7GW of new renewables and storage investment by Accel by 2030, saying it is too slow. That view is echoed by environmental groups.

“It is simply not moving quick enough,” says Dan Gocher, the director of Climate & Environment at the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility.

“Alignment with the Paris Agreement across both demerged entities was a fundamental demand of a majority of AGL’s shareholders less than a year ago. (When 53 per cent voted in support of a demerger that was “consistent” with the Paris target).

“We don’t expect AGL’s largest shareholders will take well to being ignored. According to the IEA and the IPCC, alignment with the Paris Agreement means closing coal-fired power stations in OECD countries by 2030.”

It should also be noted that the Australian Energy Market Operator’s planning blueprint assumes all brown coal generators will be closed within a decade, with system reliability maintained, and that is a view endorsed by the overwhelming majority of energy experts.

AGL’s scheme booklet also appears to support more of Cannon-Brooke’s complaints about the demerger – namely that the split entities may not be worth as much as they would together, would have fewer funding options, and will lose other benefits of working together.

Indeed, as is usual in such deals, the only easily defined winners of the de-merger so far is the bevy of lawyers, bankers and other advisors, who will share in a windfall $260 million from the costs of the demerger.

According to the AGL booklet, around $160 million of these costs are locked in anyway, meaning they will be incurred whether or not the scheme is approved by shareholders on June 15.

Advisory costs of $75 million include fees paid to financial advisors, independent board advice, and legal, tax, accounting, human resources and strategy costs.

Another $185 million of restructuring costs include a range of activities associated with restructuring and separating the companies, and establishing the new debt facilities (banking fees).

The document also notes that the demerger will increase net tax inefficiencies with a net present value of approximately $125 million, and will require $200 million of extra working capital, mostly to manage margin calls associated with energy trading activities.

It will also result in net additional corporate and operating costs of approximately $35 million per year, and add around 1.25 per cent and 1.40 per cent to its debt margins.

AGL’s list of advantages are not huge. It focuses mostly on creating a “cleanskin” company in the form of AGL Australia, which will be freed of the coal assets and able to pursue green solutions for its customers, and to offer its shareholders choice.

But this is exactly the problem that Cannon-Brookes has highlighted – in effect jettisoning the coal assets into a company with no credible climate target, and with less resources to negotiate the transition.

And energy market observers – at least those keen to reach zero emissions (which is most of them) – are horrified.

“Loy Yang has a carbon intensity of 1.3 (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) tco2-e/mwh,” independent analyst Ketan Joshi (also a contributor to RenewEconomy) tweeted.

“This is the plant they’re wanting to run until 2045. Their worst power plant for another 23 years. I am not being hyperbolic when I say that this really is madness.”

See also: Win or lose, Cannon-Brookes is forcing coal die-hards to face the future

And: “Coal fired power stations will close, regardless of who’s in office”; says Bowen

Giles Parkinson is founder and editor-in-chief of Renew Economy, and founder and editor of its EV-focused sister site The Driven. He is the co-host of the weekly Energy Insiders Podcast. Giles has been a journalist for more than 40 years and is a former deputy editor of the Australian Financial Review. You can find him on LinkedIn and on Twitter.

Giles Parkinson

Giles Parkinson is founder and editor-in-chief of Renew Economy, and founder and editor of its EV-focused sister site The Driven. He is the co-host of the weekly Energy Insiders Podcast. Giles has been a journalist for more than 40 years and is a former deputy editor of the Australian Financial Review. You can find him on LinkedIn and on Twitter.

Share
Published by
Tags: Governments

Recent Posts

Nationals leader asks LNP planning minister to “call in” already approved wind project in his own electorate

The leader of the Nationals, David Littleproud, says he has written to the LNP state…

12 September 2026

Australia’s most powerful battery flexes muscles with second shock absorber test and biggest every charge

Australia's most powerful battery completes second of its shock absorber tests, and then flexes its…

12 September 2026

Expert committee to assist federal oversight of consumer energy resources, with minister having final say

Energy ministers meeting details how the federal government plans to set and enforce standards for…

12 September 2026

Doctored photos, unsafe installs: Regulators continue crackdown on solar and energy rebate breaches

One solar company fined $100,000 for failing to have fall protection in place, another made…

11 September 2026

Large 900 MW battery and data centre planned at former nuclear power plant site

Huge battery and data centre proposed for nuclear power plant site in Germany, as renewables…

11 September 2026

Setting the standards: Why consumer energy resources deserve a better policy approach than “Ready, Fire, Aim”

Shortfalls in governance of consumer energy resources will be obvious - and potentially costly and…

11 September 2026