Nuclear

Like running Hazelwood for 106 years: Labor says Dutton’s nuke plan will be akin to a carbon bomb

Published by

Emissions from coal and gas could grow by 1.7 billion tonnes by 2050 if their use is extended another 15 years, under the Coalition’s nuclear power plans, an analysis from the federal government has found. 

The government evaluated data from the 2024 Integrated System Plan by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), which provides a road map for Australia’s energy transition for the national energy market.

If coal and gas were extended to 2040 to pave the way for the coalition’s nuclear energy plan, the additional CO2-equivalent emissions created would be almost four times Australia’s current output, the government said. 

The output would be the equivalent of keeping all of Australia’s cars on the road for another 40 years or having the nation’s most polluting plant – Hazelwood in Victoria – run for 106 years.

Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the government was working to lower energy prices and emissions after a decade of delays.

But the progress was “precarious”, Mr Bowen said, and any future delays would impede the government’s emission goals. 

“The coalition needs to come clean about its plan to reduce emissions and meet Australia’s energy needs,” he said. 

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and the coalition have pledged to build seven nuclear plants across five states on the sites of coal-fired power stations if they win government.

An election must be held by May 17, 2025. 

Plans to build nuclear plants could cost up to $600 billion and the coalition has said nuclear reactors could be online by 2037, although most experts say nuclear is unlikely to be built in Australia before the late 2040s, due to the planning, regulatory, investment, labour and technology issues.

Wayne Smith from the Smart Energy Council said extending coal and gas for future nuclear power would be a “carbon bomb” for Australia and its emissions.

“This is coal keeper on steroids,” he told AAP. 

“It’s coal keeper and gas keeper.

“You increase coal and gas, you reduce solar and renewables; you increase pollution and you increase power bills. 

“That’s a really dangerous deal.”

Mr Smith said nuclear and solar “don’t play well together”. 

“They cancel each other out,” he said.

AAP will seek comment from Mr Dutton’s office. 

AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

CEFC invests $70m to help electrify and decarbonise maritime ports

CEFC announces “landmark” investment to help decarbonise maritime ports in South Australia, focusing on the…

16 September 2024

What gas shortage? Fossil lobby warns of blackouts, but Australia has 6x more gas than it needs

Australia is producing 6x more gas than the regulator's predicted shortfall, says the Australia Institute…

16 September 2024

Australia must start valuing storage duration to solve winter demand peaks and renewable droughts

Australia needs more longer duration energy storage to fix a forecast winter demand peak when…

16 September 2024

“Bulldozer:” Albanese slammed after bowing to mining lobby and refusing climate trigger

Albanese slammed by Greens and cross bench after refusing climate trigger at behest of mining…

16 September 2024

SwitchedOn Podcast: A Q&A on household electrification with Tesla-driving sparkie

Brendan Lang is an electrician from Melbourne who swapped his diesel guzzling tradie ute for…

16 September 2024

NSW aims for a million solar battery homes in landmark consumer energy strategy for no coal grid

NSW's new Consumer Energy Strategy aims for 1 million homes and small businesses kitted out…

16 September 2024