Like running Hazelwood for 106 years: Labor says Dutton’s nuke plan will be akin to a carbon bomb

Published by

Emissions from coal and gas could grow by 1.7 billion tonnes by 2050 if their use is extended another 15 years, under the Coalition’s nuclear power plans, an analysis from the federal government has found. 

The government evaluated data from the 2024 Integrated System Plan by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), which provides a road map for Australia’s energy transition for the national energy market.

If coal and gas were extended to 2040 to pave the way for the coalition’s nuclear energy plan, the additional CO2-equivalent emissions created would be almost four times Australia’s current output, the government said. 

The output would be the equivalent of keeping all of Australia’s cars on the road for another 40 years or having the nation’s most polluting plant – Hazelwood in Victoria – run for 106 years.

Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the government was working to lower energy prices and emissions after a decade of delays.

But the progress was “precarious”, Mr Bowen said, and any future delays would impede the government’s emission goals. 

“The coalition needs to come clean about its plan to reduce emissions and meet Australia’s energy needs,” he said. 

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and the coalition have pledged to build seven nuclear plants across five states on the sites of coal-fired power stations if they win government.

An election must be held by May 17, 2025. 

Plans to build nuclear plants could cost up to $600 billion and the coalition has said nuclear reactors could be online by 2037, although most experts say nuclear is unlikely to be built in Australia before the late 2040s, due to the planning, regulatory, investment, labour and technology issues.

Wayne Smith from the Smart Energy Council said extending coal and gas for future nuclear power would be a “carbon bomb” for Australia and its emissions.

“This is coal keeper on steroids,” he told AAP. 

“It’s coal keeper and gas keeper.

“You increase coal and gas, you reduce solar and renewables; you increase pollution and you increase power bills. 

“That’s a really dangerous deal.”

Mr Smith said nuclear and solar “don’t play well together”. 

“They cancel each other out,” he said.

AAP will seek comment from Mr Dutton’s office. 

AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

“We are 80 pct renewable:” Wind and solar shields Gina Rinehart’s main lithium play from fossil fuel crisis

Gina Rinehart's main lithium play is being shielded from diesel price hikes by its high…

12 March 2026

Bowen allows dirty fuel into market to address petrol bowser shortfalls and amid fears of record high prices

Federal government to "temporarily" allow fuel with higher sulphur levels into market as analysts says…

12 March 2026

Methane-leaking, koala-threatening coal mine gets all-clear in state where renewables projects are in limbo

Environmental groups are urging the federal government to act to prevent a coal mine emitting…

12 March 2026

Why does an energy superpower like Australia still depend on global fossil fuels?

Now is a good time to ask why one of the most energy-rich countries in…

12 March 2026

Solar Insiders Podcast: How bushfires sparked a neighbourhood battery blueprint

Ben McGowan, managing director of community-owned retailer Indigo Power, on the key role mid-scale batteries…

12 March 2026

Kiwi’s new push into solar and battery hybrid projects on menu for UK renewable asset manager

Foresight has bought a New Zealand solar-battery specialist at a time when the market for…

12 March 2026