Coal

“Licence to harm” for coal plants costs Australians $2.4bn in health costs each year

Published by

New modelling has detailed how Australians are being left with an annual health bill of more than $2.4 billion due to the impacts of coal pollution, with leading environmental law experts claiming that a lack of pollution controls effectively amount to a ‘licence to harm’.

The new analysis has been published by Environmental Justice Australia and has assessed the impacts of coal pollution on health across three factors, which including premature deaths, low birth weight live births and additional days of asthma symptoms.

The modelling, completed by a team from the Actuaries Institute of Australia, assessed each of these factors against two metrics; the direct economic costs and the costs caused by the ‘burden of disease’.

The modelling drew upon peer reviewed research recently published by Greenpeace Australia that has estimated that coal pollution has been responsible for causing approximately 800 premature deaths, 14,500 asthma attacks and 850 babies to be born with low birthweight.

Across these factors, the modelling estimated the costs of coal pollution in Australia on human health at more than $2.4 billion each year, which is in addition to the costs that will be caused by coal emissions through the impacts of global warming.

Coal pollution affects a staggering proportion of the Australian community, with as many as 2.1 million Australians exposed to some form of toxic pollution produced by coal-fired power stations, which can contribute to heart disease, stroke, lung cancer, low birthweight babies, and Type 2 diabetes.

Environmental Justice Australia said that the report showed the extent to which Australia’s fleet of coal power stations escapes the costs of the health impacts caused by the pollution produced from the burning of coal.

“Deadly air pollution generated by Australia’s 22 ageing coal-burning power stations can no longer be ignored and our governments must urgently move to address the serious flaws in our regulatory system that have fuelled this public health crisis,” lawyer for Environmental Justice Australia, Bronya Lipski, said.

Lipski pointed to the fact that Australia’s fleet of coal-fired power stations bear none of the costs of the pollution that they are responsible for, and said that this lack regulation from governments effectively amounted to a ‘licence to harm’.

“We have a public health crisis generated by lack of pollution control on coal-fired power stations. No Australian state has any active strategy to reduce air pollution with policies and programs to ensure clean air. Australia’s coal-fired power stations are not even fitted with many of the basic pollution controls required in most other countries that can cut toxic pollutants by more than 85 per cent,” Lipski said.

“Instead, power stations in Australia are licenced to emit pollutant concentrations that dramatically exceed limits set by comparable countries. This amounts to our governments giving these coal-fired power stations a licence to harm our communities.”

University of Queensland economist John Quiggin said that the findings from the Actuaries Institute of Australia modelling showed that Australians were carrying a significant cost burden caused by coal pollution and that, in light of the current health challenges facing the world, governments should be moving to address coal pollution.

“The Actuaries Institute report confirms that Australians, rather than big polluters, are paying a hidden health cost,” Quiggin said. “The economic damage caused by coal far outweighs any benefits — which have, in any case, largely disappeared.

“As a possible recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic comes into sight, it’s time to place human health above the desire to maintain the economic status quo. Australia can and should get off coal by 2030, without harming workers employed in the industry. In doing so, we will be saving both lives and money.”

Environmental Justice Australia has called on state governments to introduce urgently needed regulatory measures, to address the impacts of pollution caused by coal-fired power stations.

“State governments must urgently crack down on air pollution and implement clean air strategies with measures to reduce pollution from coal-fired power stations to as close to zero as possible, set strong stack emission limits in line with international standards and require operators to install continuous stack monitoring and best practice pollution controls,” Lipski added.

Michael Mazengarb is a climate and energy policy analyst with more than 15 years of professional experience, including as a contributor to Renew Economy. He writes at Tempests and Terawatts.
Michael Mazengarb

Michael Mazengarb is a climate and energy policy analyst with more than 15 years of professional experience, including as a contributor to Renew Economy. He writes at Tempests and Terawatts.

Recent Posts

Australia’s biggest publicly owned wind farm gets federal green tick to go ahead in Queensland

Australia's biggest publicly owned wind farm has been cleared for construction in Queensland coal country…

20 February 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: How industry, AI and data centres are reshaping demand

GridBeyond CEO Michael Phelan on how industrial loads and data centres are being orchestrated by…

20 February 2026

Australian home battery upstart banks “strategic investment” towards manufacturing plans

Perth-based energy storage and off-grid energy system specialist secures a new private equity investor to…

20 February 2026

Can all solar homes become smart energy hubs? On paper – absolutely! IRL, a few hurdles remain

A South Australian trial to turn homes into grid-responsive energy hubs is now 100 households…

20 February 2026

Plan for Australia’s biggest solar-battery hybrid, with eight hours storage, get federal green tick

Plans for one of Australia's biggest solar-battery hybrid projects have been waved through the federal…

20 February 2026

AI + energy: Monster child of Origin and Facebook – or a smart, decentralised grid?

Will AI’s growing role in the grid democratise clean energy, or simply shift power from…

20 February 2026