We’ve mentioned this before, but one of the striking patterns of behaviour in the energy industry over the last decade has been the ability of the “established” energy experts to completely underestimate the growth of renewable energy – and to overplay the credentials of fossil fuels.
As we have seen in Australia, this has been a costly exercise, resulting in massive over-investment in poles and wires, and in fossil fuel generation. Similar stories have been played out across the world.
So who is best at getting the forecasts right? This interesting graphic shows that the green NGOs – those accused in dealing in “fantasy” – are a lot closer to the mark, particularly when it comes down to forecasts for wind and solar capacity additions.
The graph below pretty much speaks for itself. Greenpeace has been a lot closer to reality than the International Energy Agency. Perhaps it also has a better grip on how quickly the world can move to a largely renewable-based energy system.
State and federal governments aim for 7,000 green and industrial jobs under new master plans…
Key changes have been made to renewable tenders to ensure that the winning projects can…
Soaring syncon costs and supply issues, along with delays to coal closures, is opening up…
This note provides an estimate of demand and supply of tokens, draws a conclusion about…
A new wind-battery hybrid project speeded through state approvals, now it needs one more nod,…
England and Norway experienced big surges in demand during half time and hydration breaks in…
