A fact little known to most Americans is that the grid they rely on for electricity is controlled by quasi-public organizations whose lavishly paid executives and board members conduct business in deep secret.
Independent system operators, or ISOs, work almost entirely behind closed doors, even though their every action affects public electricity customers of all stripes—residential, business and public sector.
I call them quasi-public because so much of what they do so profoundly affects the utility-consuming public, even as their corporate structure and inner workings are shrouded in mystery. ISOs in effect are public agencies exempt from public scrutiny—and, as a sadly predictable result, quasi-public corporations gone wild.
A little background: ISOs run the electric grid region by region across the United States. Some cross state lines. Those include PJM (whose initials are derived from its footprint: Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland) and MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator: 11 Midwestern states and part of Canada). Others, such as NYISO, the New York Independent System Operator, are confined to one state.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) mandates that each ISO ensures that enough electricity is generated across the grid to avoid blackouts. FERC also charges each ISO with making sure electricity is fed into the grid at competitive prices and that the appropriate power-generation mix is in place.
Who knows, though, if any of this is happening?
NYISO is a good case study. While it conducts so-called auctions to determine how much electricity will cost, these events are managed according to extremely arcane rules that seem designed to obfuscate rather than illuminate. In its murky dealings, NYISO also provides a system of ratepayer subsidies to prop up aging power plants that may rarely operate but are deemed necessary in case demand exceeds supply. These plants, sometime referred to as “reliability-must-run” facilities, are often nuclear or coal-fired, which means they don’t fit into the new energy economy that is taking root, but that their owners are subsidized for keeping dinosaurs alive.
These practices by NYISO raise a multitude of questions that go unanswered because NIYSO operates so far beyond public view. Are NIYSO auctions conducted in a manner that is truly in the public interest? Are the subsidies it hands out to old plants truly in the interest of NIYSO’s millions of customers? Does the organization follow policies that benefit public health and the environment?
Add to these very good personal payouts the fact that board members choose their board cronies—without public review—whenever there’s an opening, and you have a system that ensures perpetuation.
Here are a few examples of how NIYSO stacks up against most state agencies with such far-reaching public impact:
Can NYISO’s dark practices change?
I think so, and perhaps sooner than later. Indeed, a public discussion is likely to occur in New York over the next year or so on how to reform NYISO and bring it into the light of the 21stcentury. And that’s good news, because NYISO is doing the public’s business, and the public has a right to know about it.
Larry Shapiro is IEEFA’s board president and associate director for program development at the Rockefeller Family Fund.
Source: IEEFA. Reproduced with permission.
The grid is changing rapidly, battery storage durations are getting longer, and chemistries are changing…
Allowing balcony or plug in solar will make it easier to access cheaper, cleaner electricity…
Industry expert Claire Elkin on why Australia is missing out on global capital to fund…
MELBOURNE, Australia, 28 October 2026 — Fox ESS (Fox) showcases Power Beast, G-Max Plus, Power…
Join our experts to explore how expanded rebates could unlock an 80 GW market and…
Australia is home to 163 operational data centres with almost 100 more in the national…