Solar

Connection costs down for new large-scale solar – but why?

ARENA Blog

Connection is an under-appreciated component of the complex task of creating big new solar plants for Australia’s electricity system. Factors like access to network infrastructure, the amount of new generation that piece of grid can take and the lengths of nearby lines are big parts of site selection. These costs can add up, or they can be minimised through clever thinking – it differs by site.

ARENA’s large-scale solar funding round revealed projected connection costs are noticeably lower than for existing large-scale solar projects. Our collection of data on projects that precede the funding round – generally, larger and older – show a range between approximately 12 to 27 cents of connection costs for every watt of capacity. The twenty competitive round applicants show an average of 9 cents per watt, with more projects in the lower or zero connection costs band. This illustrates a fluid environment for companies looking to plug their big solar into the network, and it opens a fascinating question – why are the costs lower for ARENA’s large-scale solar funding round?

Many winners of ARENA’s LSS round include solar plants co-located with existing power stations, such as wind farms, which would reduce connection costs. The ARENA-funded study into co-location of wind and solar plants found that:

Major savings can be obtained in the grid connection infrastructure and installation, operation and maintenance and development costs (including land costs, development approvals and studies). These savings are estimated at 3 to 13% for [capital costs] and 3 to 16% for [operational costs].

There’s little doubt these effects have been borne out in the cream-of-the-crop projects that featured in ARENA’s large-scale solar funding round.

Another potential explanation is relatively simple – our call for applications encouraged aggressive competition among the bidders (it wasn’t called a competitive round by accident) . This well-designed process lead to bidders choosing sites for their cost-effectiveness, and the connection data ARENA has gathered almost certainly reflects this.

This article was originally published on the Australian Renewable Energy Agency’s blog. See the original here.

Recent Posts

Australia is making mixed progress on emissions, and rapid cuts are needed, says CCA

The Climate Change Authority has welcomed the introduction of "substantial" policies by the Albanese government…

28 November 2024

New tender opens for another 6 GW of wind and solar as record year puts 2030 renewables target within reach

New tender for 6 GW for wind and solar opens, as Climate Authority calls for…

28 November 2024

SwitchedOn Podcast: Health workers call for electrification of all public hospitals

Health care workers and medical groups are calling on the federal government to kick start…

28 November 2024

Coalkeeper, Queensland style: LNP commits $1.4 bn, sets utility KPIs, to keep coal generators on line

New LNP government commits $1.4 billion to the upkeep of state's ageing coal fleet, and…

28 November 2024

Peabody just made the biggest climate acquisition of the year

The US-based coal miner has just paid over $A5 billion dollars to acquire some of…

28 November 2024

“Get out of the way:” Manufacturer wants more renewables to soften price crunch and avoid shutdowns

Manufacturer of wind farm anchor cages wants governments to "get out of the way" and…

28 November 2024