Policy & Planning

Coalition power plan “nuked” at poll: climate groups

Published by

Labor’s landslide election victory shows Australians have overwhelmingly rejected the coalition’s nuclear energy plan, climate action groups say.

Labor on Saturday night stormed to victory, winning a swathe of seats across multiple states and unseating Opposition Leader Peter Dutton in his own electorate.

The coalition’s nuclear plan proposed to build seven reactors across Australia with the first of these not operational until 2035 at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars.

Mr Dutton has said it would help reduce carbon emissions and deliver lower cost electricity and gas, and reliable energy.

But climate action groups on Sunday said the election result confirmed Australians’ opposition to nuclear power.

Australian voters had resoundingly rejected Peter Dutton and his nuclear plan, Climate Council CEO Amanda McKenzie said.

“This was an energy referendum. Nuclear bombed at the ballot, with Australians dubbing it toxic,” Ms McKenzie said in a statement.

Mr Dutton not only “nuked” his party’s chances of winning with pro-pollution policies but the nuclear fantasy cost him his own seat, she said.

Voters emphatically backed clean energy over coal, gas and nuclear, said Australian Conservation Foundation CEO Kelly O’Shanassy, with nuclear now “off the table”.

“That door is not just closed, it is welded shut.”

The Clean Energy Council said the election result was a vote of confidence by Australians in a clean energy future.

“The Australian people have reconfirmed their strong support for wind and solar backed by batteries, pumped hydro and a small amount of gas,” CEO Kane Thornton said.

Mr Dutton’s “dangerous and expensive” nuclear plan was a “complete policy fail”, said Glenn Walker of Greenpeace Australia Pacific.

The coalition policy was just a smokescreen to prolong the use of coal and gas in the energy system, he said.

Nationals leader David Littleproud said he didn’t think the nuclear plan was the reason the coalition lost.

“I think it was a schmick campaign by Labor destroying Peter Dutton,” he told Sky News on Sunday.

“I think many people were more interested about the cost-of-living crisis. That’s why we talked a lot about gas.”

The coalition would work through its policy positions and make sure they were fit for purpose and the future, Mr Littleproud said.

Source: AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Energy minister for Australia’s most renewable state says he’s “absolutely fine” with gas-firmed data centres

Another state energy minister raises the spectre of deviating from a federal government plan to…

13 November 2026

Local developer puts huge wind and battery proposal forward for federal green tick

Plans to install up to 92 wind turbines and a big battery on Australia's biggest…

13 November 2026

One of Australia’s biggest renewable projects signs up to explore potential for green ammonia bunkering

Developer of up to 26 GW hybrid renewable energy project signs up to explore using…

13 November 2026

Chart of the day: Even bioenergy is outpacing nuclear power in the global generation stakes

Buried in an International Energy Report on electrification is a telling graph that reveals a…

13 November 2026

Oversupply, price wars, rebate cuts: What’s really going on with Australia’s home battery market?

Concerns about oversupply in the home battery market are mingling with rumours that the Cheaper…

13 November 2026

New four-hour battery storage proposal seeks federal green tick for Australia’s most renewable state grid

A proposed 300 MW and up to four-hour battery located 150 kilometres northeast of Adelaide…

13 November 2026