Coal

Coal industry’s final insult to humanity: It’s killing our sperm

Published by

We know that coal fired power generation is damaging the climate, killing people through lung and respiratory disease, and that new coal plants are more expensive to build than wind or solar.

What other harm could the burning of fossil fuels possibly cause?

It turns out that it might be killing our sperm as well.

Current estimates suggest that the human health burden that comes from burning coal effectively adds another $13/MWh to its cost as an energy source.

But this dollar figure could be about to rise, after a new scientific found that coal power pollution is damaging the very seed of human existence: sperm quality.

The observational study, published this week in BMJ Journals, found that Taiwanese men exposed to higher levels of air pollution – much of it the type caused by coal and petrol engines – tended to have poorer quality sperm.

The researchers examined “the swimmers” of close to 6500 men who participated in a standard medical examination program between 2001 and 2014.

It then compared the results of their tests to the estimated levels of fine particulate matter around each man’s home.

The result observed “a robust association” between exposure to particulate matter and a decrease in the normal shape and size of sperm, but also higher concentrations of sperm.

The authors say that although they can’t prove cause and effect, and the effects are small, the study highlights an important public health challenge, with air pollution potentially becoming a risk factor of male reproductive health.

“Although the effect estimates are small and the significance might be negligible in a clinical setting, this is an important public health challenge,” the report says.

“Given the ubiquity of exposure to air pollution, a small effect size of PM2.5 on sperm normal morphology may result in a significant number of couples with infertility. We advocate global strategies on mitigation of air pollution to improve reproductive health.”

So, you can add that to the hidden cost of coal. A social cost of carbon pollution runs at around $40/tonne, and the direct impact on human health is put at $13/MWh. So let’s add damage to reproductive systems to the tab.

Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of Renew Economy and editor of its sister site, One Step Off The Grid . She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

State’s stand-alone solar fail: The energy transition should deliver more than a new landlord

Western Power's stand-alone power system program is not an energy transition solution. It is a…

10 July 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Electric truck network starts to take shape

Electric trucks are suddenly big news in Australia. We catch up with NewVolt's Anthony Headlam…

10 July 2026

Watchdog warns spike in home battery complaints could damage consumer trust

Home batteries are flying off shelves and the consumer watchdog wants stronger protection to maintain…

10 July 2026

Offshore wind developers pray for bipartisan support ahead of key state election

Victoria's offshore wind developers are much more optimistic than they were a year ago, but…

10 July 2026

State utility bets on Australian-first compressed CO2 “energy dome,” with up to 12 hours of storage

Victoria's Latrobe Valley will soon host a ground-breaking long-duration energy storage facility capable of continuously…

10 July 2026

“It’s nuts:” Wind developer forced to truck giant transformer thousands of kilometres after port refusal

Renewable developer says the refusal of its closest port to handle a giant transformer has…

10 July 2026