Coal

Coal industry’s final insult to humanity: It’s killing our sperm

Published by

We know that coal fired power generation is damaging the climate, killing people through lung and respiratory disease, and that new coal plants are more expensive to build than wind or solar.

What other harm could the burning of fossil fuels possibly cause?

It turns out that it might be killing our sperm as well.

Current estimates suggest that the human health burden that comes from burning coal effectively adds another $13/MWh to its cost as an energy source.

But this dollar figure could be about to rise, after a new scientific found that coal power pollution is damaging the very seed of human existence: sperm quality.

The observational study, published this week in BMJ Journals, found that Taiwanese men exposed to higher levels of air pollution – much of it the type caused by coal and petrol engines – tended to have poorer quality sperm.

The researchers examined “the swimmers” of close to 6500 men who participated in a standard medical examination program between 2001 and 2014.

It then compared the results of their tests to the estimated levels of fine particulate matter around each man’s home.

The result observed “a robust association” between exposure to particulate matter and a decrease in the normal shape and size of sperm, but also higher concentrations of sperm.

The authors say that although they can’t prove cause and effect, and the effects are small, the study highlights an important public health challenge, with air pollution potentially becoming a risk factor of male reproductive health.

“Although the effect estimates are small and the significance might be negligible in a clinical setting, this is an important public health challenge,” the report says.

“Given the ubiquity of exposure to air pollution, a small effect size of PM2.5 on sperm normal morphology may result in a significant number of couples with infertility. We advocate global strategies on mitigation of air pollution to improve reproductive health.”

So, you can add that to the hidden cost of coal. A social cost of carbon pollution runs at around $40/tonne, and the direct impact on human health is put at $13/MWh. So let’s add damage to reproductive systems to the tab.

Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of Renew Economy and editor of its sister site, One Step Off The Grid . She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Fortescue wind technology company completes first “crane-less” turbine installation

Fortescue wind technology company achieves its first "craneless" wind turbine installation, using a system similar…

26 May 2026

Wind industry warns of capital flight if Liberals press “pause” on transmission projects

Victoria shadow minister David Davis promises to pause and "review" major transmission projects - an…

26 May 2026

Up is not down: BHP in spotlight as epic decarbonisation walk-back revealed

We need an urgent show of political courage to decouple BHP and its peers from…

26 May 2026

BHP and Fortescue at war over diesel and technology as Four Corners exposes Big Australian’s green energy backflip

As Fortescue aims for zero emissions, mining rival BHP is achieving zero credibility after an…

26 May 2026

“They’re gone:” End of an era as Liddell coal plant chimneys demolished in spectacular explosion

Chimney stacks from shuttered Liddell coal plant come down in a series of spectacular explosions,…

26 May 2026

Solar, wind and batteries push down electricity bills for homes and business, despite global fuel crisis

Electricity costs will fall for homes and businesses across Australia's main grid, as wind, solar…

26 May 2026