Press Releases

Coal country backs renewable energy: Poll

Published by
The Australia Institute
19 September 2017 10:17 AM

PRESS RELEASE

A new ReachTEL poll, commissioned by The Australia Institute’s Climate and Energy Program, asked residents of the electorates of Hunter and Shortland about energy policy, including government investment in coal, renewables and the Liddell coal power station.
Strong majorities in the coal electorates (61% and 57%) preferred government investment in renewables than in coal (32% and 36%).
Question: Which would you prefer the government to invest in, coal or renewables?
In the division of Hunter, the electorate in which the Liddell power station lies, more respondents supported the AGL decision to close Liddell (49%), than the Turnbull Government intervention to force the company to sell or keep open the plant (39%).
Question: Energy company AGL has announced that in 2022 it will be closing its Liddell coal-fired power station in the Hunter Valley in NSW, because it is 50 years old, and it plans to replace it with a mixture of renewable energy. Do you support AGL’s decision, or should it be forced to keep the coal power station open or sell it?
“Keeping an ageing 50-year old coal plant open is last thing that should be the focus of our debate if cheaper prices and reliability are the goals,” Executive Director of The Australia Institute, Ben Oquist said.
“AEMO did not recommend keeping Liddell open. Its annual report is actually a guide for where the opportunities for investment lie.
“For cheaper prices, reliability and to meet emissions reduction targets that focus should be on demand management, renewables, storage and a ‘smarter’ grid.
“Voters also want a clean energy target, and they want an ambitious one, with 45% in both electorates polled supporting a RET of 50 per cent by 2030, or more, of all electricity generation.
“This polling shows it is not just the experts, voters in coal electorates think government intervention with Liddell is a bad idea too.
“A political obsession with coal puts Australia at risk of missing out on the renewable energy investment and jobs boom,” Oquist said.
The Australia Institute

Share
Published by
The Australia Institute
Tags: AGLcoalrenewable energy
19 September 2017 10:17 AM

Related Post

Recent Posts

Bowen launches review of emission caps and credits for Australia’s biggest carbon polluters

Policy review will investigate settings for Australia's 2030 and 2035 emissions reduction targets.

7 August 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Will data centres make or break wind?

Kane Thornton has moved from the peak renewables body to data centres, now the presumed…

7 August 2026

Climate Active is dead. The funeral will not be certified carbon neutral

Australia's government-run "carbon neutral" certification scheme is being wound up. It is good news for…

7 August 2026

Australia’s first offshore wind auction is “going ahead as planned,” new energy minister confirms

Victoria's newly appointed energy minister says the state will go ahead as planned with Australia's…

7 August 2026

Labor’s data centre gas double-speak leaves the gate open for dodgy offsets

A promise of banning gas while waving through “gas firming” and “gas peaking” with unlimited offsets leaves…

7 August 2026

Massive wind project, with up to 280 of Australia’s biggest-ever turbines, seeks federal green tick

Plans for a potentially massive new wind farm start federal environmental assessment, proposing up to…

7 August 2026