Press Releases

Coal country backs renewable energy: Poll

Published by
The Australia Institute
19 September 2017 10:17 AM

PRESS RELEASE

A new ReachTEL poll, commissioned by The Australia Institute’s Climate and Energy Program, asked residents of the electorates of Hunter and Shortland about energy policy, including government investment in coal, renewables and the Liddell coal power station.
Strong majorities in the coal electorates (61% and 57%) preferred government investment in renewables than in coal (32% and 36%).
Question: Which would you prefer the government to invest in, coal or renewables?
In the division of Hunter, the electorate in which the Liddell power station lies, more respondents supported the AGL decision to close Liddell (49%), than the Turnbull Government intervention to force the company to sell or keep open the plant (39%).
Question: Energy company AGL has announced that in 2022 it will be closing its Liddell coal-fired power station in the Hunter Valley in NSW, because it is 50 years old, and it plans to replace it with a mixture of renewable energy. Do you support AGL’s decision, or should it be forced to keep the coal power station open or sell it?
“Keeping an ageing 50-year old coal plant open is last thing that should be the focus of our debate if cheaper prices and reliability are the goals,” Executive Director of The Australia Institute, Ben Oquist said.
“AEMO did not recommend keeping Liddell open. Its annual report is actually a guide for where the opportunities for investment lie.
“For cheaper prices, reliability and to meet emissions reduction targets that focus should be on demand management, renewables, storage and a ‘smarter’ grid.
“Voters also want a clean energy target, and they want an ambitious one, with 45% in both electorates polled supporting a RET of 50 per cent by 2030, or more, of all electricity generation.
“This polling shows it is not just the experts, voters in coal electorates think government intervention with Liddell is a bad idea too.
“A political obsession with coal puts Australia at risk of missing out on the renewable energy investment and jobs boom,” Oquist said.
The Australia Institute

Share
Published by
The Australia Institute
Tags: AGLcoalrenewable energy
19 September 2017 10:17 AM

Related Post

Recent Posts

Australia’s biggest coal state breaks new ground in wind and solar output

New South Wales has reached two remarkable renewable energy milestones that signal the growing contribution…

6 January 2025

New Year begins with more solar records, as PV takes bigger bite out of coal’s holiday lunch

As 2025 begins, Victoria is already making its mark on the energy landscape with a…

3 January 2025

What comes after microgrids? Energy parks based around wind, solar and storage

Co-locating renewable generation, load and storage offers substantial benefits, particularly for manufacturing facilities and data…

31 December 2024

This talk of nuclear is a waste of time: Wind, solar and firming can clearly do the job

Australia’s economic future would be at risk if we stop wind and solar to build…

30 December 2024

Build it and they will come: Transmission is key, but LNP make it harder and costlier

Transmission remains the fundamental building block to decarbonising the grid. But the LNP is making…

23 December 2024

Snowy Hunter gas project hit by more delays and blowouts, with total cost now more than $2 billion

Snowy blames bad weather for yet more delays to controversial Hunter gas project, now expected…

23 December 2024