Graph of the Day: Climate action is better for the economy

Published by

Given that Australia’s federal election is all about the economy, and conflicting policies on climate change, a new posting by Skeptical Science is timely. It addresses they myth that CO2 limits will damage economic growth. It says that not making serious efforts to curb emissions will incur serious economic costs, a conclusion made by numerous studies, including Ross Garnaut’s, but one that has yet to register in the Australian political debate circa 2013.”

“It’s not unreasonable to expect that the effects of climate change will create greater economic instability worldwide,” Skeptical Science note in their post.The solution is, of course, to reduce fossil fuel use. One way to do this is to shift away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy sources. The other way is to reduce energy demands through increased efficiency.”

The article addresses the idea that imposing a price on carbon will damage economic prospects, but notes that in the upcoming fifth IPCC Assessment Report, a new set of scenarios called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) will be used to illustrate the trajectories for economic performance under various emissions scenarios.

Here is the table:

Figure 1: GDP projections of the four scenarios underlying the RCPs (van Vuuren et.al. 2011). Grey area for income indicates the 98th and 90th percentiles (light/dark grey) of the IPCC AR4 database (Hanaoka et al. 2006). The dotted lines indicate four of the SRES marker scenarios.

“The graph of GDP clearly shows that the pathways that reduce emissions the most in that time frame (2.6 – green, and 4.5 – red) are those with the best long-term economic performance,” the posting notes. “In other words, the investment required to reduce emissions is repaid by increased economic performance. Business as usual strategies (high-emission scenarios RCP 6 and 8.5) are the least profitable; the money saved early on is dwarfed by the costs of damage and disruption done in the longer term.”

The rest of the article can be found here.

 

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Electrifying Australia: Nine key problems facing homes and businesses, and where to from here

What are the biggest hurdles to electrifying Australia? We ask the people who are building,…

22 June 2026

Big batteries caught short as worst wind drought in two years sends prices through the roof

Australia's main grid chalked up its worst one-day wind drought in more than two years…

22 June 2026

Queensland approves giant new coal mine for one of Australia’s biggest polluters

A massive coal mine expansion backed by a global mining giant has been given environmental…

22 June 2026

First towers erected, transformers arrive at only wind project being built in Australia’s biggest coal state

Works at the only wind farm being built in NSW right now takes two important…

22 June 2026

Fortescue signs agreement to accelerate zero-emissions shipping with green ammonia

Australian iron ore giant signs agreement to charter up to 12 ammonia-capable ships, marking a…

22 June 2026

Giant 3.6 gigawatt onshore wind farm claims title of biggest renewable project in US history

Developer of mammoth onshore wind farm in New Mexico says the project is now fully…

22 June 2026