China spoils launch of world’s first electric cargo ship by using it to haul coal

Published by

ThinkProgress

SIBERIAN COAL AWAITS LOADING ONTO A SHIP BOUND FOR CHINA IN NORTH KOREA, JULY 2016. CREDIT: AP/ERIC TALMADGE
SIBERIAN COAL AWAITS LOADING ONTO A SHIP BOUND FOR CHINA IN NORTH KOREA, JULY 2016. CREDIT: AP/ERIC TALMADGE

The good news is that China, the world leader in electric vehicle production and use, has launched the world’s first all-electric, 2,200-ton cargo ship. The bad news is that the groundbreaking vessel is being used to haul coal.

Since shipping is poorly regulated and runs almost entirely on heavy fuel oil, the trillion-dollar industry is a major polluter. Major ports are notorious for having unhealthy air.

And even though the industry generates some 3 percent of global carbon pollution, the 2015 Paris climate agreement doesn’t even cover shipping, since it targets emissions by nations, not transport between them.

That leaves much of the job of cleaning up the industry to individual companies. So it should be a welcome moment that China’s Guangzhou Shipyard International has launched “the world’s first electric ship with a capacity” of 2,200 tons, as the state-run Global Times reported earlier this month.

CREDIT: CHINANEWS.COM/PENG YONGGUI

The ship is short-haul: It can travel about 50 miles with its 1,000 lithium batteries after two-hour charge, which is the loading and unloading time for the ship, state news site ChinaNews.com reports. So it can be charged while it is docking.

Sadly, the Chinese spoiled the launch of this otherwise green cargo ship by using it to transport coal for electricity generation on the Pearl River in Guangdong Province.

The ship can carry up to 2,300 tons of coal, though ChinaNews.com reports such vessels could in the future be used for “passenger ships, ro-ro ships [roll-on/roll-off vessels carrying wheeled cargo] engineering vessels” and similar purposes.

“This kind of ship takes into consideration the harmony between humans and nature and can protect water quality and marine life, and should be copied by other ships sailing on local rivers,” Chinese environmentalist Wang Yongchen told the Global Times.

Certainly running on electricity of any kind is better for the local environment than burning heavy fuel oil. But moving rapidly off of coal generation is the only way China can ensure that the total lifecycle emissions of transporting cargo on an all-electric ship is beneficial to both their country’s air quality and the world’s effort to preserve a livable climate.

Source: ThinkProgress. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by
Tags: Governments

Recent Posts

One Nation promises to build new coal plants and sweat old ones in energy policy pitch to state voters

One Nation has promised to extend the life of a coal-fired power plant as part…

31 August 2026

Changing tack on Victoria’s energy transition will throw electricity savings into reverse, experts warn

One Nation and Coalition plans to review or roll back Victoria's energy policies would likely…

31 August 2026

“Smart switch:” Retailer tests time-of-use plans in bid to slash bills of hardship customers

State-owned retailer will pilot time-of-use electricity plans across 5,000 select households, to see how much…

31 August 2026

From solar cells to solar farms: Quest for ultra-low cost PV gets $100 million federal boost

Australian Renewable Energy Agency will invest more than $100 million across 20 research and development…

31 August 2026

SwitchedOn podcast: How three hours of free solar power can cost you more

Solar Sharer exposes a fundamental problem with our energy system - protecting retailer revenues can…

31 August 2026

Rooftop solar record tumbles as battery rebate drives 1 GW of new installs over just three months

April to June quarter delivers new records for home batteries and large-scale solar investment, but…

31 August 2026