Other Good Stuff

California mandates solar PV on all new residential buildings

Published by

The rumblings and rumours were right on the money earlier this week, correctly predicting that, in a meeting held by the California Energy Commission on Wednesday that it would mandate rooftop solar PV installations on all new residential buildings built from 2020 onwards.

As we reported yesterday, reports had been circulating for a few days suggesting that the California Energy Commission (CEC) would approve a change to its 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standardswhich would require all new residential buildings – including new homes, condos, and apartment buildings – to include solar PV installations.

The potential decision was heralded by clean energy proponents as a momentous occasion. In addition to the solar requirements, the new Standardsalso incentivised energy storage and efficiency measures, all seeking to reduce the climate impact of residential dwellings in the Golden State.

And, as expected, the CEC met on Wednesday and voted unanimously to approve the new building standards which would, amongst other things, “require solar photovoltaic systems starting in 2020.”

According to the Commission, the move is intended to cut energy use in new homes by more than 50% and is set to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by around the same amount as taking 115,000 cars off the roads.

“Under these new standards, buildings will perform better than ever, at the same time they contribute to a reliable grid,” said Commissioner Andrew McAllister, who is the Energy Commission’s lead on energy efficiency. “The buildings that Californians buy and live in will operate very efficiently while generating their own clean energy.

They will cost less to operate, have healthy indoor air and provide a platform for ‘smart’ technologies that will propel the state even further down the road to a low emissions future.”

Under the new building standards, all new residential dwellings will be required to install solar panels on their roof or tap into a community solar project.

There are exceptions for homes and buildings which are honestly incompatible with solar – such as those with the wrong type of roof, or those affected by shade from neighbouring trees or tall buildings.

Builders will also be required to meet stringent energy efficiency standards, involving design choices such as high-performance attics, walls, and windows, as well as properly installed insulation.

The new codes also encouragebuilders to install energy storage systems such as home battery systems like the famed Tesla Powerwall, or heat pump water heating.

Any new requirement like this was always going to increase the cost of construction, but the long-term benefits of a solar PV installation will well and truly offset those costs.

Specifically, according to the Commission – based on a 30-year mortgage – monthly payments will increase by around $40 but will in turn save consumers around $80 a month on heating, cooling, and lighting bills.

“With this adoption, the California Energy Commission has struck a fair balance between reducing greenhouse gas emissions while simultaneously limiting increased construction costs,” said California Building Industry Association CEO and President Dan Dunmoyer.

“We thank the Commissioners and their staff for working with the building industry during the past 18 months and adopting a set of cost-effective standards that ensures homebuyers will recoup their money over the life of the dwelling.”

Unsurprisingly, the move was heralded as a landmark step for not only the solar industry, but for government policies and building codes.

“This is an undeniably historic decision for the state and the US California has long been our nation’s biggest solar champion, and its mass adoption of solar has generated huge economic and environmental benefits, including bringing tens of billions of dollars of investment into the state,” said Abigail Ross Hopper, SEIA’s president and CEO.

“Now, California is taking bold leadership again, recognizing that solar should be as commonplace as the front door that welcomes you home.”

Vivint Solar, one of the United States leading residential solar providers, also praised the efforts, congratulating “the state of California for building the foundation to adopt a forward-thinking approach to its renewable energy initiatives.”

Joshua S. Hill is a Melbourne-based journalist who has been writing about climate change, clean technology, and electric vehicles for over 15 years. He has been reporting on electric vehicles and clean technologies for Renew Economy and The Driven since 2012. His preferred mode of transport is his feet.

Joshua S Hill

Joshua S. Hill is a Melbourne-based journalist who has been writing about climate change, clean technology, and electric vehicles for over 15 years. He has been reporting on electric vehicles and clean technologies for Renew Economy and The Driven since 2012. His preferred mode of transport is his feet.

Recent Posts

Fast lane to electric, and Snowy blowouts | Energy Insiders

Bruce Hardy from the Energy Futures Foundation on the fast track to electric transport, and…

29 October 2026

WA renewable energy target sends investors the signal they need – at a critical time

A strong state target for renewables sends the message that WA is a stable market.…

29 October 2026

Ratings system designed to restore trust in wind and solar developers goes live, with first batch scoring well

Online rating tool that ranks renewable energy developers and transmission companies against seven key criteria,…

29 October 2026

“Anti-renewables populism is the largest unpriced risk:” But poll data shows support is growing, even in hot zones

Polling by Squadron Energy finds higher support than expected in western Victoria and central NSW,…

29 October 2026

LNP hits brakes on pumped hydro project, spooked by Snowy 2.0 cost blowout

Contracting for huge pumped hydro project has reportedly been suspended by the state treasurer and…

29 October 2026

Snowy 2.0: The potentially $50 billion shambles that really needs a proper cost-benefit analysis

Even now, with $12 billion sunk, stopping Snowy 2.0 may be the least-worst decision. It…

29 October 2026