Commentary

A tale of two budgets: A win for cheaper, cleaner energy in one state, more “coal-keeper” in the other

The New South Wales and Queensland state budgets released yesterday were a picture in contrasts.

NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey was unequivocal on the central role of energy transition in economic growth and prosperity. Mookhey emphasised that the renewables transition is a top driver of investment into the state, with renewable energy infrastructure a significant contributor to the 20% surge in investment over the year to the March quarter 2026.

He noted that clean energy transformation is ‘not merely an environmental cause, but an economic strategy’, and that to campaign against renewables, as his counterparts elsewhere and in previous governments have done, is to campaign against investment and jobs.

Home Energy Saver program

A centrepiece of the 2026-27 NSW budget was $557 million (previously announced) under the Home Energy Saver program to households with interest-free loans of up to $15,000 over ten years to install energy-saving and cost-cutting upgrades.

The NSW Home Energy Saver program is expected to benefit more than 32,000 households across the state by making it easier for more households to install rooftop solar, household batteries, insulation, reverse-cycle air conditioning, switchboard upgrades, and draught-proofing. 

This is a significant boost for NSW consumers that further turbocharges the massively successful Cheaper Home Batteries program of the federal government, providing a 30% discount to the upfront cost of installing home battery systems.

More than 400,000 homes have now deployed batteries under the scheme in less than a year, adding 11.2 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of distributed, dispatchable energy to the grid. 

The NSW Home Energy Saver program provides the critical financing support for low- to middle-income earners and households to take advantage of the massive cost savings that are realised through renewable energies. It will also help to safeguard families from inflationary and volatile fossil fuel markets – one of the largest drivers of the cost-of-living crisis that has thrashed Australians.

Support for low-emissions manufacturing to accelerate the energy transition

The NSW government has launched the $480 million Net Zero Manufacturing Initiative to fast-track emissions reduction and build enabling technologies of the energy transition.

Building on the $52m provided to four projects across agriculture, transport and electricity decarbonisation streams, yesterday’s budget confirmed $225m across three grant streams to support the development of low-emissions technologies, support local manufacturing capacity of low-carbon products, and stimulate local manufacturing of renewable generation, storage and transmission components.

Relatedly, backing in the development of clean energy and delivering to regions, the NSW budget allocated $291.4 million in 2026-27 towards upgrades to regional roads to support the transportation of equipment to renewable energy zones, strengthening regional agriculture and industrial sectors with energy security and stability.

CEF applauds these measures which are vital to realising a vision that places NSW at the centre of a prosperous domestic zero-emissions future.

Tomago aluminium smelter

Tomago is Australia’s biggest single energy user, supports more than 3000 direct and indirect high value jobs and is a key export industry. Its majority owner Rio Tinto is threatening closure on the basis that it cannot procure electricity after December 2028 at a market price low enough to guarantee continued operations. 

NSW is continuing to work closely with the federal government, currently undertaking direct negotiations with the smelter on a new power purchase arrangement.

Yesterday’s budget includes a provision for NSW to contribute to ensuring Tomago’s ongoing operation, pending its federal counterparts finalising negotiations with the smelter, however details remain sketchy.

The policy problem here is of national significance if Australia is to realise its Future Made in Australia vision. A number of structural solutions have been put forward to leverage the balance sheets of the NSW and federal governments.

This could include a government backed scheme finance vehicle (SFV) to finance a renewables buildout surge which would ensure clean energy supply to Tomago and other major industrial facilities at stable, long-term, commercially viable prices.

What is clear is that the clock is ticking and the merry-go-round of taxpayer-slugging subsidies without a permanent solution – such as the forthcoming bailout – needs to stop. The NSW and federal government must act with urgency to secure the future of green manufacturing in this country, and Tomago is key to that.

Coal royalties

One area of energy policy where NSW falls down is coal royalties. The 2026-27 budget revised royalties up by $84m in 2025-26 and $186m in 2026-27 reflecting higher thermal coal prices in response to major disruptions to the flow of oil and gas resulting from the conflict in the Middle East lifting global commodity prices for fossil fuel energy sources. 

While the people of NSW see some short-term improvement to the budget, the latest energy crisis rams home the opportunity cost and lost prosperity from failure to implement a progressive royalty structure in which royalty rates increase as the market price of coal rises. This equitably delivers higher returns to the people in times of energy crisis, where fossil fuel prices are inflated and exporters are making superprofits. 

Fossil fuel demand is inevitably in terminal decline, and the rate of displacement of coal with renewables ratchets up with each global energy crisis, and accelerates with the continued massive export of renewable energy technologies from China. There is a narrowing window of opportunity for NSW to replicate the leadership shown by the former Labor Government of QLD to introduce a progressive royalty regime. 

Queensland fails on energy as it doubles down on coal generation and leaves renewables begging

In contrast to NSW, the Queensland budget misses the mark completely on energy, ignoring the enduring social and economic benefits of an accelerated transition to renewables.

Instead, the Crisafulli government budget shows a clear emphasis on the importance of intergenerational investments into infrastructure such as transport. This is also key, but not at the expense of the former.

The budget lays out just $490m for renewable energy generation and storage — a fraction of the spend into fossil fuels. 

Royalty and land rent revenues are expected to be $2bn higher in 2026-27 than forecast in 2025-26 MYFER, as a result of elevated commodity prices for LNG, coking and thermal coal, and increased coal production following weather-based disruptions in 2025-26.

Queensland’s LNG exports rose to a record volume of 24Mt in 2024-25, and are expected to be as strong in 2025-26. Treasurer David Janetzki has confirmed no changes will be made to the state’s coal royalty regime, choosing to continue to benefit from the political courage of the previous government which introduced the progressive royalty regime against howls of protest from the fossil fuel lobby. 

Billions into sustaining ageing coal capacity and new gas

The Queensland budget includes $5.1 billion to upgrade and sustain the state’s ageing coal-fired power stations and build out new transmission infrastructure. This includes $1.8 billion over the next five years (up from previous estimates of $1.6 bn) allocated to maintain existing power generators.

The “electricity maintenance guarantee” will include $520 million in 2026-27 for upgrades to Stanwell, Tarong, and Kogan Creek coal-fired clunkers and the Wivenhoe pumped hydro station. $501m will go to the Gladstone Project, a $2.5 billion transmission project to support the local grid ahead of the closure of QLD’s oldest and largest coal-fired power plant, the Gladstone Power Station. 

Treasurer Janetzki spuriously claimed the state’s five-year energy plan – which scrapped renewable energy targets and extended the life of coal and gas-fired generators – was already delivering for Queenslanders through lower energy prices. 

This is despite the fact that the Australian Energy Regulator attributed the 2-14% drop in wholesale energy prices in the 2026-27 Default Market Offer (DMO) across the national electricity market to increased output from wind and batteries and less dependence on gas and hydro in evening peaks.

This dropped the DMO by 7.2% for residential customers and 10.4% for small businesses across Southeast QLD. For rural and regional consumers, this determination from the Regulator was passed through the Queensland Competition Authority to ensure proportional savings were delivered to regional QLD. 

A legitimate energy plan should deliver enduring downward pressure and stability on electricity prices. However, deploying $1.8bn into sustaining the state’s ageing and increasingly unreliable coal-fired clunker capacity only extends the exposure and vulnerability of consumers and industry to the volatility and insecurity of international fossil fuel markets. 

The latest modelling from AEMO, AER, and CSIRO all confirm firmed renewable energy is the cheapest form of power moving forward. Putting bandaids on ageing assets without building out and enabling low-cost replacement capacity poses a significant risk to the sustainability, both economically and environmentally, of the QLD grid.

Funding to support the development of critical minerals value-add

On a more positive note, the Queensland government will allow state strategic project declarations and introduce new powers to support delivery of high-priority projects aimed at fast-tracking the next wave of critical minerals and other state-significant projects, helping unlock extraction, processing and export opportunities that strengthen and diversify the state’s economy. The 2026-27 budget includes $146.1m in new measures to support extraction, processing and rehabilitation.

A tale of two budgets

What was made abundantly clear with the release of both state budgets was the stark contrast in the recognition of the role renewable energy plays in securing enduring economic and social benefits to households, small businesses and industrial consumers.

Treasurer Mookhey’s budget correctly emphasised the critical role renewable energy investment and low-emissions products and technology will play in diversifying and improving the resilience of the NSW economy.

On the other hand, Treasurer Janetzki has missed the mark on energy, leaving Queenslanders exposed for longer to the unsustainable downsides of fossil fuels by producing a massive infrastructure plan that fails to deliver firmed renewables as a central pillar of industrial resilience and cost-of-living pressure reduction. 

Share

Recent Posts

More storage is vital, but there’s a much cheaper and easier way to manage winter demand and wind droughts

The solution to managing high winter electricity demand and the occasional wind drought is obvious.…

25 June 2026

Wind giant unveils huge new hybrid proposal, with option for batteries to be plugged into turbines

A major new wind and storage project is seeking state and federal approval for plans…

25 June 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Solar and batteries good, wind is hard

We look at AEMO's Integrated System Plan, plus the latest big battery tender, and the…

25 June 2026

“It’s costing us so much:” Councils vote for polluter-pays climate compensation fund

Funding community climate resilience and repairs via a fossil fuel company levy has been formally…

25 June 2026

Households lead march to least-cost electricity, as AEMO issues “call to arms” on renewable transition

Bolstered by the boom in consumer resources, AEMO's new Integrated System Plan confirms that a…

25 June 2026

Big shortfall in wind will put Australia’s 2030 renewable target out of reach, AEMO says in latest blueprint

Drought in large-scale wind projects is putting Australia's renewable targets under strain, and AEMO acknowledges…

25 June 2026