$1 bin geothermal project takes Costa Rica closer to 100% renewables

Published by

CleanTechnica

A geothermal project valued at $958 million US dollars was approved by members of the Costa Rican Legislative Assembly within the last week.

Over $600 million of the total will potentially be funded by two sources: the Japanese International Cooperation Agency and European Investment Bank.

The Japanese agency will provide $540-560 million, and the European bank $70 million. The remainder will come from the Costa Rican Electricity Institute. Only a 0.6 percent interest rate will be charged by Japan, and  Costa Rica will have forty years to pay back the loan.

There still needs to be another vote in the Constitutional Court, but this process is expected to be happening in the next several days.

The expected location is Guanacaste near Rincón de la Vieja. The first plants are expected to generate about 55 MW and cost approximately $333 million to build. Two other 50 MW plants will be built as well, about 40 kilometers from the Pailas II plants.

A Costa Rican official, Teofilo de la Torre, said that when operational, the new geothermal plants could generate electricity at about five cents per kilowatt-hour. It has been reported that Costa Rica wants to be carbon neutral by 2021, so developing geothermal would help them achieve that goal. In 2010, it was reported that about 13% of Costa Rica’s energy came from geothermal.

Geothermal Project Produces 100% Clean Energy

If the naturally abundant, forward-looking Central American nation is already at 80% of its electricity from hydro power, adding  a large geothermal capacity will only move it closer toward 100% clean energy.

Costa Rica has been a regional leader in providing electricity access and for keeping costs low:

In Costa Rica, 250 kWh would be enough satisfy the monthly needs of low- and middle-income households. The average domestic consumption in 2009 was slightly above 224 kWh, and 75% of ICE’s users consume that amount or less. On average, in other Latin American countries, users had to dedicate 14.6% of the minimum salary, while in Costa Rica only 7% was needed to pay for an equivalent amount of electricity.

The three proposed geothermal projects will likely create a number of jobs and therefore hold potential for stimulating the economy where they are located. Geothermal has an advantage over solar and wind power, because it is very steady, rather than intermittent.

 Source: CleanTechnica. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Australia’s biggest battery project slashes footprint by 20 pct as it mulls multi-gigawatt hour extension

Rapidly improving battery densities, falling costs and changing market signals behind potential major expansion of…

16 August 2026

S-curve modelling says renewables can kick coal out of Australia by 2032. But is this soon enough?

In the race to renewables, the big question is whether "faster than we thought" is…

14 August 2026

“It’s a commercial system. And it has a customer:” Sodium-ion battery sale hailed as a first for Australia

The sale of a 100 kilowatt and 200 kilowatt-hour sodium-ion battery system is being claimed…

14 August 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Will the green bank save the Tomago deal?

CEFC boss Ian Learmonth explains why big wind projects may finally get delivered this year.…

14 August 2026

Balcony solar or building integrated PV? The emerging options for apartment dwellers and owners

A Victorian parliamentary inquiry on apartment energy issues has recently reported and identified several issues…

14 August 2026

CEFC boss says funding deals for new wind and solar farms to power giant smelter still to be sorted

Head of green bank says Tomago green transition deal likely to get big wind projects…

14 August 2026