The reported all-in cost shown below is representative of each company’s own internal manufacturing costs. In contrast, total blended cost, which accounts for internal manufacturing costs and OEM, may be meaningfully higher depending on reliance on and cost of OEM. For example, Trina Solar’s second quarter internal cost was 48 cents per watt and its blended cost was 54 cents per watt.
Yingli’s successful reduction of all-in costs came on both the silicon and non-silicon fronts, which typically represent a respective 20 percent and 80 percent proportion of all-in module costs. Yingli’s silicon costs dropped from 10 cents to 9 cents per watt and non-silicon costs dropped from 42 cents to 40 cents per watt between the first and second quarters of the year.
According to Jade Jones, upstream solar analyst at GTM Research, “pushing beyond the 50-cents-per-watt cost barrier allows firms to capture greater margin and provides a means to offset volatile OEM costs, high polysilicon prices, and aggressively priced regional end markets.”
Jones notes that previously, the roadmap to lower costs was driven by falling input prices. “Moving forward,” added Jones, “firms will have to bank on technological improvements such as better silicon utilization, increased automation, and higher efficiency levels.”
Source: Greentech Media. Reproduced with permission.
Transmission remains the fundamental building block to decarbonising the grid. But the LNP is making…
Snowy blames bad weather for yet more delays to controversial Hunter gas project, now expected…
In 2024, Renew Economy's traffic jumped 50 per cent to more than 24 million page…
In our final episode for the year, SunWiz's Warwick Johnston on the highs and the…
CEFC winds up 2024 with record investment in two huge transmission projects, as Marinus reveals…
Regulator says big energy players are manipulating prices to their benefit. It's not illegal, but…