ExxonMobil CEO sues to block fracking project near his home

Published by

CleanTechnica

 

As ExxonMobil’s CEO, it’s Rex Tillerson’s job to promote the hydraulic fracturing enabling the recent oil and gas boom, and fight regulatory oversight. The oil company is the biggest natural gas producer in the U.S., relying on the controversial drilling technology to extract it.

The exception is when Tillerson’s $5 million property value might be harmed. Tillerson has joined a lawsuit that cites fracking’s consequences in order to block the construction of a 50m-foot water tower next to his and his wife’s Texas home.

The Wall Street Journal reports the tower would supply water to a nearby fracking site, and the plaintiffs argue the project would cause too much noise and traffic from hauling the water from the tower to the drilling site. The water tower, owned by Cross Timbers Water Supply Corporation, “will sell water to oil and gas explorers for fracing [sic] shale formations leading to traffic with heavy trucks on FM 407, creating a noise nuisance and traffic hazards,” the suit says.

Though Tillerson’s name is on the lawsuit, a lawyer representing him said his concern is about the devaluation of his property, not fracking specifically.

When he is acting as Exxon CEO, not a homeowner, Tillerson has lashed out at fracking critics and proponents of regulation. “This type of dysfunctional regulation is holding back the American economic recovery, growth, and global competitiveness,” he said in 2012. Natural gas production “is an old technology just being applied, integrated with some new technologies,” he said in another interview. “So the risks are very manageable.”

In shale regions, less wealthy residents have protested fracking development for impacts more consequential than noise, including water contamination and cancer risk. Exxon’s oil and gas operations and the resulting spills not only sinks property values, but the spills have leveled homes and destroyed regions.

Exxon, which pays Tillerson a total $40.3 million, is staying out of the legal tangle. A spokesperson told the WSJ it “has no involvement in the legal matter.”

Source: CleanTechnica. Reproduced with permission.

 

 

 

 

 

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

One Nation promises to build new coal plants and sweat old ones in energy policy pitch to state voters

One Nation has promised to extend the life of a coal-fired power plant as part…

31 August 2026

Changing tack on Victoria’s energy transition will throw electricity savings into reverse, experts warn

One Nation and Coalition plans to review or roll back Victoria's energy policies would likely…

31 August 2026

“Smart switch:” Retailer tests time-of-use plans in bid to slash bills of hardship customers

State-owned retailer will pilot time-of-use electricity plans across 5,000 select households, to see how much…

31 August 2026

From solar cells to solar farms: Quest for ultra-low cost PV gets $100 million federal boost

Australian Renewable Energy Agency will invest more than $100 million across 20 research and development…

31 August 2026

SwitchedOn podcast: How three hours of free solar power can cost you more

Solar Sharer exposes a fundamental problem with our energy system - protecting retailer revenues can…

31 August 2026

Rooftop solar record tumbles as battery rebate drives 1 GW of new installs over just three months

April to June quarter delivers new records for home batteries and large-scale solar investment, but…

31 August 2026