Woodside preparing “new climate bomb” on gas peninsula

Published by

Gas giant Woodside Energy has been accused of preparing to detonate a “new climate bomb” that would dwarf national efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The proposed $50 billion project is designed to bolster the existing Pluto LNG and North West Shelf projects by creating a regional production hub on the Burrup Peninsula in the Pilbara region of Western Australia.

Most of the gas produced by the hub would be exported rather than being used by Australian households or industries.

A report released by the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) on Thursday found lifetime pollution from Burrup Hub would cancel out the entire savings from all existing household rooftop solar systems in Australia for more than 344 years.

“Woodside’s proposed Burrup Hub gas mega project is a climate disaster in the making,” campaigner Elizabeth Sullivan said.

“Plans to start sending gas from the vast new Scarborough and Browse gas reserves to an expanded Burrup Hub would detonate a new climate bomb.”

She said the precinct was already Australia’s largest polluter and the hub would be in the top 10 biggest carbon bombs globally.

At more than six billion tonnes across its lifetime, emissions from the mega-project would be greater than the annual emissions of the United States or more than 13 times Australia’s annual emissions.

The report by Piers Verstegen shows the largest new fossil fuel project in the southern hemisphere would also dwarf Woodside’s promised abatement efforts.

The hub would place Australia in the company of countries that are undermining global action on climate change, according to the environmental organisation. 

The only countries hosting more polluting oil and gas facilities than the Burrup Hub are Russia, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, the ACF said.

The federal government will soon decide whether to approve aspects of the Scarborough and Browse gas projects and a 50-year extension to the North West Shelf.

“To allow these projects to proceed would recklessly undermine international efforts on climate change and seriously damage Australia’s credibility on these issues,” Ms Sullivan said.

AAP

Marion Rae is the Future Economies Correspondent at Australian Associated Press (AAP).

Marion Rae

Marion Rae is the Future Economies Correspondent at Australian Associated Press (AAP).

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

What fossil madness is this? Wars can’t interrupt flow of wind and the sun, but all we hear is drill, baby, drill

Australia is in the grip of a global fossil fuel crisis. It knows it has…

20 March 2026

Can Australia make its own wind turbine parts? Global giant suggests it might be at the whim of federal LNP

CEO of global wind giant says bipartisan agreement needed if local manufacturing is to be…

20 March 2026

Why some of Australia’s energy market conventions should go the way of the dinosaurs

We face some big challenges. To what extent should we protect businesses designed to operate…

20 March 2026

In the case of critical minerals, China did not take our lunch – we left it on the table

Australia needs to apply a new lens of green energy and industry statecraft, including developing…

20 March 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Why batteries are the answer to nearly everything

We talk to Jeff Monday from Fluence on the fall in battery costs and the…

20 March 2026

Independent panel approves gigawatt scale battery three months after local opponents force referral

Independent Planning Commission gives approval to gigawatt-scale standalone battery project just three months after it…

20 March 2026