Commentary

We published an analysis from a leading economist on soaring nuclear costs. Facebook removed it

Published by

On Sunday, Renew Economy published an analysis on the soaring cost of nuclear power by leading economist John Quiggin. On Monday we attempted to post it in our feed on social media.

Facebook removed the item, saying it was an attempt to generate clicks by providing misleading information. We’d like to know on what basis this decision was made, but Facebook has yet to provide an answer.

It’s a concerning development, and not the first time one of our posts has been removed by Facebook.

Social media platforms including Facebook, X, YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram – are full of unchecked and misleading information about climate change and energy technologies. Much of it is complete nonsense creating FUD – fear, uncertainty and doubt – about new technologies.

It appears to be part of a well-funded and orchestrated plan by vested interests, and the fossil fuel industry in particular, to demonise renewables, electric vehicles, battery storage and other emerging competitors.

Much of this is amplified in mainstream media, where outrageous claims against renewables – and claims of blackouts, economic collapse and environmental failure – are repeatedly given voice.

Quiggin is a leading economist with the University of Queensland. His analysis is based on verifiable facts and data. It points to the most recent nuclear power plant deals done in Europe, in Czechia, and observes that the revealed prices put the cost of nuclear well above the estimate included in the recent CSIRO GenCost report.

That observation is important, because the CSIRO and its GenCost report have been repeatedly attacked by the federal Coalition, conservative media, pro-nuclear lobbyists and the fossil fuel industry. They say that the GenCost report puts too high a price on nuclear power and accuse it of cherry-picking.

Quiggin notes that the Czechia deal suggests the opposite is true, and confirms the widely held view in the energy industry itself that GenCost underestimates rather than overestimates the costs of nuclear. Nuclear, he says, is really really expensive.

But Facebook has now ruled that such analysis is misleading, and it won’t allow its users to view such information. Over the last few months, this has happened on several occasions to Renew Economy and its sister site The Driven.

Just last week, another article on the certification of green hydrogen technologies in Australia was pulled down. Last month, it was a story on how households will be a driving force of the energy transition. A few months earlier, an analysis on nuclear costs by Jeremy Cooper, the former deputy chair of ASIC and chair of the 2009/10 Super System Review, was also removed.

Over on The Driven, a story on how EVs are actually suitable for farmers in regional communities, was also pulled down. No explanation was provided. Despite protests, the posts were not reinstated.

Yet Facebook allows media groups such as Sky News Australia to post misleading information about renewables and climate without a check.

It’s a shocking development, and one that points to the manipulation of information by naysayers and vested interests. Some attribute it to the work of shadowy groups with strong Australian fossil fuel links that have campaigned against renewables, the Voice referendum, climate action, and climate protests.

Researchers say that the whole point of these networks and so called “institutes” and think tanks is to drown out actual academic expertise. The networks do this, researchers say, to reduce the capacity for public and government influence with its own corporate propaganda that is dressed up as “research.” 

George Monbiot, a columnist for the Guardian, describes many such networks as “junk tanks.” Jeremy Walker, from the University of Technology in Sydney, in a paper, cites Australian think tanks such as the Centre for Independent Studies and the Institute for Public Affairs, both strongly and openly anti renewable, and pro nuclear.

Their Facebook pages all still full of articles and videos making outrageous claims about renewables and nuclear. But that, it seems, is OK for the social media giant.

Giles Parkinson

Giles Parkinson is founder and editor of Renew Economy, and of its sister sites One Step Off The Grid and the EV-focused The Driven. He is the co-host of the weekly Energy Insiders Podcast. Giles has been a journalist for more than 40 years and is a former deputy editor of the Australian Financial Review. You can find him on LinkedIn and on Twitter.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Trina submits approval for Victoria big battery, as locals campaign against solar and storage projects

Trinasolar and Mint Renewables have now both lodged planning applications for neighbouring big batteries in…

29 November 2024

Australia to reshape manufacturing base as Greens deal excludes fossil fuels from flagship industry policy

Greens make last minute commitment to vote for $22 billion Future Made in Australia policy…

29 November 2024

Andrew Forrest seeks green tick for another wind and battery project as Clarke Creek powers up

Andrew Forrest's Squadron Energy seeks green tick for new wind and battery project in NSW…

29 November 2024

“We like renewables, but …” This is why industry is now calling for Local Energy Hubs

The phrase we’ve heard a hundred times is “we like renewables, but…”.  The main problem…

29 November 2024

Wind, solar and battery pipeline: Albanese better not stuff up Bowen’s excellent tenure

Australia has a strong pipeline of projects to meet its renewables targets. Things are starting…

29 November 2024

Australia is making mixed progress on emissions, and rapid cuts are needed, says CCA

The Climate Change Authority has welcomed the introduction of "substantial" policies by the Albanese government…

28 November 2024