Utility-scale PV power plants now cost-effective in US

Published by

Large-scale solar power plants are now economic in the US state of Oregon. This is one of the surprising findings of the Oregon Solar Energy Industries Association’s recently published “Vision to Integrate Solar in Oregon” (VISOR). Produced by Chris Robertson & Associates, with support from the Bonneville Environmental Foundation, the VISOR study can be accessed at chrisrobertsonassociates.com

The cost of producing solar electricity from large-scale power plants is less than the regulated avoided costs of the two largest electric utilities in the state (Portland General Electric and PacifiCorp). The Oregon Public Utility Commission regulates their avoided costs, which are published as part of the utility rate schedules. Power plant owners can get long-term contracts to sell solar energy to the utilities at the avoided cost rates.

Solar power plants would be even more profitable to build if plant owners were paid for the non-energy benefits their PV power plants create. Many benefits to the utility system are not now priced, but nevertheless are real. Here are three (of many) examples: A fleet of PV power plants would reduce risk of electric price volatility associated with natural gas generation and the region’s hydroelectric system. The three-phase inverters in PV power plants can provide valuable power factor correction services to the power grid. And avoided carbon emissions alone could be worth $20 or more per megawatt-hour, as the following chart illustrates.

The new reality of cost-effective solar energy power plants caught many in the Northwest’s energy policy community by surprise. The influential Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s 2010 regional power plan regarded utility-scale PV as not cost effective by a wide margin; by the end of 2012, their 2010 forecast of PV capital cost was too high by a factor of five.

The conventional wisdom is changing in response to new market research. As this new awareness of PV economics grows, the region’s electric power institutions will need to adapt their planning models and management strategy to accommodate a growing solar resource. The new solar economics means that the power system will be challenged to integrate a growing solar resource into the grid.

Chris Robertson is a business consultant, innovator and entrepreneur in the clean energy technology industry. For more than thirty years his work has been focused on how to accelerate the transition to a sustainable energy economy powered by renewable energy systems. Robertson can be contacted at cnrobertson@comcast.net

This article was originally posted on Cleantechnica. Re-produced with permission.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

A break down of new wind and solar projects: When will they blow, and when will they shine?

There are a lot of wind and solar projects in the pipeline. Will they be…

10 March 2025

Coalition’s Canavan forgets he’s backing nuclear, calls for new coal power as election looms

Coalition senator has long called for Australia to build new coal power plants -- except…

10 March 2025

Labor’s election rout paves way for household battery rebate, but big challenge remains on wind and solar

W.A. Labor has proven to be very good at getting grid batteries built, and promises…

10 March 2025

Australian company lands $15 million in new funds for technology to stabilise solar-heavy grid

Australian company that specialises in pole mounted battery inverter technology that helps stabilise the grid…

10 March 2025

CEFC’s Debelle says Trump energy moves leave Australia well placed to lure US clean tech investment

A less-favourable climate for clean technology capital elsewhere in the world might work to Australia's…

10 March 2025

Renewables champion and head of Origin Energy bid picked as Canada PM to take on Trump and Musk

Former governor of the Bank of England, UN climate champion, renewables advocate and leader of…

10 March 2025