Commentary

Truths and tropes of transmission costs: How much are consumers really paying?

Published by

One of the category errors which keeps rearing its head amongst both the anti-renewables brigade and PeopleWhoShouldKnowBetter(TM) is the trope of how transmission costs are passed on to customers.

The following statements are true:

1. Network costs constitute circa 30-40% of a consumer’s energy bill.

2. A significant expansion of the transmission network costing many billions of dollars has been proposed to support building renewable generation in windy and sunny parts of the country with insufficient infrastructure.

The category error lies in the suggestion that this transmission buildout will smash consumer bills by some order of magnitude, or that transmission costs constitute a materially significant portion of consumer bills.

Transmission costs are recovered from two places – residential and C&I consumers via distribution network tariffs, and directly from generators connected to the HV transmission network (typically as capacity charges).

Distribution costs on the other hand are largely recovered from consumers (and the handful of distribution-connected generation and storage assets).

There is also an order of magnitude difference in the size and complexity of the transmission and distribution network infrastructure. Per the AEMC State of the Energy Market report 2024 (figs 3.2 & 3.3 on p70):

– Transmission accounts for ~ 44,000 km of lines with a total RAB of $26B

– Distribution accounts for ~ 768,000 km with a total RAB of $90B.

Even with a huge expansion in the transmission system these costs will remain a small proportion of consumer energy bills – the transmission expansion comes alongside more generation connecting to the grid, which also pay for some of the costs.

Per the AEMC Residential Electricity Prices Trends 2024 report (p36) Transmission costs account for ~10% of total network costs, and aren’t projected to materially increase over the next decade.

None of this is to suggest that we shouldn’t have a debate about the costs, viability and necessity of the transmission buildout, or how those costs are recovered.

But can we have an *informed* debate, please?

Alex Leemon is a self-described “NEM Nerd” and manager, customer and energy markets manager at PolarBlue

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

LNP takes credit for Labor wind deals as it boasts of huge oil and gas project pipeline

Queensand LNP government celebrates its new focus on fossil fuels, and makes some very misleading…

19 April 2026

Small solar and battery specialist adds another 27 projects as it buys up competitor

Sydney-based "distributed" renewables outfit inks deal to buy portfolio of 27 small solar and battery…

17 April 2026

Stunning growth of battery storage puts it at centre of global energy security needs, for cars and for grids

The demand for batteries - for EVs and grid - has surged in the last…

17 April 2026

Huge wind, solar and battery renewables project joins queue for federal green tick

A massive hybrid renewables and battery project has joined the queue for federal environmental assessment,…

17 April 2026

Snowy elbows out Origin and others to land $1.9 billion renewable power deal for state’s trains and electric buses

Updated: Snowy Hydro lands $1.9 billion deal to supply 100 pct renewable power for state's…

17 April 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Batteries take centre stage as world wrestles with fuel crisis

BMI's Iola Hughes discusses the extraordinary growth of battery storage, for EVs and the grid,…

17 April 2026