Trump budget cuts on climate science ‘an all-out assault on Earth’

Published by

Think Progress

Credit: Tom Toles, reprinted with permission
Credit: Tom Toles, reprinted with permission

Donald Trump’s “see no evil” approach to climate change became dangerously real this week.

A four-page White House budget memo secured by The Washington Post reveals the Trump administration wants a 17 percent cut in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s overall budget — with the deepest cuts coming from earth observation. NOAA studies the atmosphere and oceans — often using satellites — to better understand climate and weather.

Under the draft Trump plan, NOAA’s satellite program would be cut by more than a half billion dollars. These cuts would be “devastating” both to NOAA and the United States, extreme-weather expert Dr. Kevin Trenberth told ThinkProgress.

“All of the major fronts in advancing weather forecasting and El Nino forecasts come from climate research involving interactions between the atmosphere and the ocean, and land surface and moisture flows. Satellite data are a vital part of this enterprise as well,” he said.

These cuts would be particularly dangerous given that the Trump team has suggested eliminating NASA’s Earth observation program and shifting its work over to NOAA. According to Bob Walker, a Trump senior campaign adviser, NASA should focus on exploration and studying deep space, not “politically correct environmental monitoring.”

Apparently, the only kind of satellites team Trump likes are those that point away from Earth and thus can’t see and report on our changing climate. Who cares if those satellites are also critical for agricultural forecasting, disaster planning, weather prediction, and predicting the path of extreme events like hurricanes, tsunamis, and tornadoes?

“Cutting NOAA’s satellite budget will compromise NOAA’s mission of keeping Americans safe from extreme weather and providing forecasts that allow businesses and citizens to make smart plans,” former NOAA chief Jane Lubchenco told the Post. NOAA’s former chief scientist Rick Spinrad said such cuts “would virtually guarantee jeopardizing the safety of the American public.”

“The truth is now laid bare,” said Dr. Michael Mann. “Trump and his cronies are serving as agents for fossil fuel interests like ExxonMobil and the Koch Brothers in dismantling scientific programs that deal with the
inconvenient science of human-caused climate change.”

“It’s an all-out assault on Earth,” the renowned climate scientist, who recently co-authored The Madhouse Effect with Pulitzer prize-winning cartoonist Tom Toles, told ThinkProgress. It’s time for scientists “to stand up and be counted,” he said.

Source: Think Progress. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Offshore wind “absolutely needed” and electrification efforts must defy “vested interests,” D’Ambrosio says

Victoria's former energy minister talks gas bans and coal closures – and says that without…

3 September 2026

Note to One Nation: Regions aren’t rejecting renewables, they just want them done properly

Anger about renewables will not be fixed by scrapping, burning or burying. If political leaders…

3 September 2026

“Why do we bother?” Australia can’t compete with China’s green transition, but it can leverage its success

A key to China's "staggering" economic success is that its "commitment to decarbonisation is absolutely…

3 September 2026

First turbine goes up at state’s only wind farm under construction

The first of 69 wind turbines has been erected at the 414 megawatt project that…

3 September 2026

Hundreds left without electricity as fire guts hydro power station

A major hydroelectric power plant has gone up in flames, gutting the station's main building…

3 September 2026

Big battery owner slapped with hefty fine for pushing up power prices and “profit maximising”

State owned company cops hefty fine for "profit maximising" and electricity price "distorting," through battery…

3 September 2026