Donald Trump

Trump budget cuts on climate science ‘an all-out assault on Earth’

Published by

Think Progress

Credit: Tom Toles, reprinted with permission
Credit: Tom Toles, reprinted with permission

Donald Trump’s “see no evil” approach to climate change became dangerously real this week.

A four-page White House budget memo secured by The Washington Post reveals the Trump administration wants a 17 percent cut in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s overall budget — with the deepest cuts coming from earth observation. NOAA studies the atmosphere and oceans — often using satellites — to better understand climate and weather.

Under the draft Trump plan, NOAA’s satellite program would be cut by more than a half billion dollars. These cuts would be “devastating” both to NOAA and the United States, extreme-weather expert Dr. Kevin Trenberth told ThinkProgress.

“All of the major fronts in advancing weather forecasting and El Nino forecasts come from climate research involving interactions between the atmosphere and the ocean, and land surface and moisture flows. Satellite data are a vital part of this enterprise as well,” he said.

These cuts would be particularly dangerous given that the Trump team has suggested eliminating NASA’s Earth observation program and shifting its work over to NOAA. According to Bob Walker, a Trump senior campaign adviser, NASA should focus on exploration and studying deep space, not “politically correct environmental monitoring.”

Apparently, the only kind of satellites team Trump likes are those that point away from Earth and thus can’t see and report on our changing climate. Who cares if those satellites are also critical for agricultural forecasting, disaster planning, weather prediction, and predicting the path of extreme events like hurricanes, tsunamis, and tornadoes?

“Cutting NOAA’s satellite budget will compromise NOAA’s mission of keeping Americans safe from extreme weather and providing forecasts that allow businesses and citizens to make smart plans,” former NOAA chief Jane Lubchenco told the Post. NOAA’s former chief scientist Rick Spinrad said such cuts “would virtually guarantee jeopardizing the safety of the American public.”

“The truth is now laid bare,” said Dr. Michael Mann. “Trump and his cronies are serving as agents for fossil fuel interests like ExxonMobil and the Koch Brothers in dismantling scientific programs that deal with the
inconvenient science of human-caused climate change.”

“It’s an all-out assault on Earth,” the renowned climate scientist, who recently co-authored The Madhouse Effect with Pulitzer prize-winning cartoonist Tom Toles, told ThinkProgress. It’s time for scientists “to stand up and be counted,” he said.

Source: Think Progress. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

CEFC invests $70m to help electrify and decarbonise maritime ports

CEFC announces “landmark” investment to help decarbonise maritime ports in South Australia, focusing on the…

16 September 2024

What gas shortage? Fossil lobby warns of blackouts, but Australia has 6x more gas than it needs

Australia is producing 6x more gas than the regulator's predicted shortfall, says the Australia Institute…

16 September 2024

Australia must start valuing storage duration to solve winter demand peaks and renewable droughts

Australia needs more longer duration energy storage to fix a forecast winter demand peak when…

16 September 2024

“Bulldozer:” Albanese slammed after bowing to mining lobby and refusing climate trigger

Albanese slammed by Greens and cross bench after refusing climate trigger at behest of mining…

16 September 2024

SwitchedOn Podcast: A Q&A on household electrification with Tesla-driving sparkie

Brendan Lang is an electrician from Melbourne who swapped his diesel guzzling tradie ute for…

16 September 2024

NSW aims for a million solar battery homes in landmark consumer energy strategy for no coal grid

NSW's new Consumer Energy Strategy aims for 1 million homes and small businesses kitted out…

16 September 2024