Solar dawns on southern tea parties

Published by

The Equation

Competition in the electric utility industry came after a nationwide flood of nuclear power cost over-runs. History is now repeating in Georgia and Florida, where popular reaction against uneconomic nuclear power is in bright contrast with support for solar energy. I wrote last week that the utilities resistance to solar makes sense only to the incumbent utility with an old business model.

The costs of nuclear plants planned and under construction in Southeast states have been shielded from economic reality by a variety of state regulatory decisions. In Florida, the collection of funds for the proposed Levy nuclear plant in advance of construction, and years before any benefits, drew new legislation.

Now, in Georgia, where the Vogtle plant expansion was too expensive at $14 billion and costs have been marching higher, the Atlanta Tea Party is calling for reforms and fair access to solar energy.

The ex-monopoly

The two traditional reasons for a monopoly in electric service NO LONGER make sense:

  1. A single set of wires run through the streets is not the only way to deliver energy, and
  2. Power plants are no longer cheaper with ever-larger size.

With the sun shining on all customers, the utility company has competition without a second set of wires. Solar energy competes for revenues with the utility model, as does energy efficiency, and reforms are needed to make sense of this new reality. As for the economies of scale in the building of generating plants, that fell apart with the wholesale competition between natural gas-powered plants and nuclear plants over 20 years ago.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is taking comments today on streamlining the process for solar interconnections. UCS has submitted comments describing utilities’ reluctance to use the data available to accommodate more solar rooftops. But the bigger challenge to the old ways of thinking about customers access to competing energy choices requires a state-by-state process. When the push to open competition created reforms in some states during the 1990s, rooftop solar wasn’t as cheap as it is now.

This is going to get interesting. You can get a front row seat at your state public utility commission’s next meeting.

Michael Jacobs is a senior energy analyst with expertise in electricity markets, transmission and renewables integration work

This article was originally published on the Union of Concerned Scientists’ Equation blog. Reproduced with permission

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

“Do it once, do it well:” Home battery installers warned not to cut corners as demand notches up

Industry warned to keep home battery installations standards high, with demand expected to ramp up…

26 February 2026

Wind farm Barnaby loves to hate sent to IPC with 550 objections, but even more submissions in support

The project that inspired Barnaby Joyce's "packet of poo tickets" comment has been sent for…

26 February 2026

Hawthorn FC names Anker SOLIX as proud official home battery partner

Leading home battery provider joins forces with the Hawks to deliver energy independence and exclusive…

26 February 2026

New demand, new renewables: Industry calls on data centres to BYO solar, wind and storage

Coalition of energy industry bodies, unions and NGOs says data centres are welcome on Australian…

26 February 2026

Company behind Australia’s largest thermal storage project wins Arena funding

NSW headquartered thermal energy storage hopeful wins federal government funding to speed up commercialisation of…

25 February 2026

Recycler cops fine over undeclared e-waste, including solar inverters and batteries

A Melbourne-based e-waste recycling company has been fined for shipping undeclared e-waste to Singapore, including…

25 February 2026