Solar dawns on southern tea parties

Published by

The Equation

Competition in the electric utility industry came after a nationwide flood of nuclear power cost over-runs. History is now repeating in Georgia and Florida, where popular reaction against uneconomic nuclear power is in bright contrast with support for solar energy. I wrote last week that the utilities resistance to solar makes sense only to the incumbent utility with an old business model.

The costs of nuclear plants planned and under construction in Southeast states have been shielded from economic reality by a variety of state regulatory decisions. In Florida, the collection of funds for the proposed Levy nuclear plant in advance of construction, and years before any benefits, drew new legislation.

Now, in Georgia, where the Vogtle plant expansion was too expensive at $14 billion and costs have been marching higher, the Atlanta Tea Party is calling for reforms and fair access to solar energy.

The ex-monopoly

The two traditional reasons for a monopoly in electric service NO LONGER make sense:

  1. A single set of wires run through the streets is not the only way to deliver energy, and
  2. Power plants are no longer cheaper with ever-larger size.

With the sun shining on all customers, the utility company has competition without a second set of wires. Solar energy competes for revenues with the utility model, as does energy efficiency, and reforms are needed to make sense of this new reality. As for the economies of scale in the building of generating plants, that fell apart with the wholesale competition between natural gas-powered plants and nuclear plants over 20 years ago.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is taking comments today on streamlining the process for solar interconnections. UCS has submitted comments describing utilities’ reluctance to use the data available to accommodate more solar rooftops. But the bigger challenge to the old ways of thinking about customers access to competing energy choices requires a state-by-state process. When the push to open competition created reforms in some states during the 1990s, rooftop solar wasn’t as cheap as it is now.

This is going to get interesting. You can get a front row seat at your state public utility commission’s next meeting.

Michael Jacobs is a senior energy analyst with expertise in electricity markets, transmission and renewables integration work

This article was originally published on the Union of Concerned Scientists’ Equation blog. Reproduced with permission

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Yes to Paris, no to targets: Dutton’s climate doublespeak causes confusion in Coalition ranks

Peter Dutton says a Coalition government won't follow Trump out of the Paris agreement, but…

24 January 2025

Massive 70 GW wind and solar project that straddles Nullarbor seeks federal green tick

The world’s biggest wind, solar and green ammonia project joins queue seeking federal environmental approval…

24 January 2025

Halting new wind farms while coal plants buckle: Is this the LNP’s plan for Queensland?

With three coal units unexpectedly down in the middle of a heatwave, it's an interesting…

24 January 2025

Complex electricity tariffs doing more harm than good, as consumers fall through the knowledge gap

Time-of-use electricity tariffs might be the way of the renewable future, but a new study…

24 January 2025

Solar charts record growth to overtake coal in EU power mix, send fossil fuels to 40-year low

Solar power output in the EU has more than tripled over the past decade and…

24 January 2025

Australia’s moment: How Trump’s fossil turn can supercharge our energy revolution

The transition to renewable energy and clean transport is a gold rush – and with…

24 January 2025