Queensland’s stealth electricity tax just keeps on giving

Published by

It’s no surprise that the Queensland government has just reported a $1.2 billion dividend from state owned distributors Energex and Ergon. Add to that the interest these corporations now pay on behalf of the state on the newly acquired $2 billion of shifted debt (about $60 million a year), and you have to wonder why there isn’t a Royal Commission in the winds.

The simple fact is the government needs money from wherever it can get it, and electricity distribution has been padded and prodded into a perfect cash machine.

Retailers are reporting record disconnections of people simply unable to support the new daily access charges and the still high energy charges that appear every quarter.

Now, as with telephony, bills are now being offered monthly, all – they say – to assist with bill shock. This will no doubt add to retailer’s expenses in your quarterly or new monthly bill, which again will end up as an unavoidable network charge. So the death spiral continues.

The longer we continue to accept these “stealth taxes” the more likely they are going to be included in the income calculations provided in the prospectuses for privatisation of state owned assets.

As each unfair and seemingly illegal cost increase is justified by “cross-subsidisation” arguments by political incumbents, the public are blind to the re-labeling or camouflaging of these costs as legitimate to distributing electricity.

The next will be a charge to subsidise the poorest 20 per cent of customers from rising charges, only to be borne by business, large users and, in defiance of the rules, solar PV owners.

And do not be surprised if these assets owned by what is now a corporation somehow revert to being an essential state utility, only for as long as it takes to make network access charges compulsory, even if you don’t use those assets.

There seems absolutely no interest by either party to address the ever increasing bulking up of utility costs in order to achieve yearly income, or in the case of the southern states, a large cash injection from the sale of these quasi taxation agencies.

It doesn’t take a genius to see how charges are being disguised and relabeled year on year to hide their real purpose; to increase revenues and dividends to either state governments or new indentured overlords.  Whoever thought a monopoly could or should be commercialised and indeed privatised should have their head read!

Rob Compbell is managing director of Vulcan Energy and a member of the Clean Energy Council

Recent Posts

“Forging the Future”? Why the coal industry may soon have to face some facts it can’t dodge

A new report finds that monitoring of methane emissions can be significantly improved, particularly for…

25 September 2026

Germany presents fossil fuel transition plan, reaffirms 2045 climate target

Germany's cabinet approves roadmap to phase out oil, coal and gas across energy, industry, buildings and…

25 September 2026

“Uncharted territory:” Fears as weather whiplash sparks tree die-off and dials up bushfire risk

Eastern Australia is not yet in the grip of a terrible 2019-20-like drought but early…

25 September 2026

Australia’s most pro-coal state is still a hot spot for wind and solar, even after ripping up renewables target

Queensland has ripped up its renewables target and cancelled projects, but it remains a hot…

25 September 2026

Energy Insiders: The off-grid mines leading the charge towards 100 pct renewables

Zenith Energy's Michael Buzzard on the remarkable energy transitions achieved in off-grid mines, and plans…

25 September 2026

Network bets its own money on filling commercial roofs with solar and storing it in community batteries

Network's revamped community power trial aims to turn surplus commercial solar into lower bills for…

25 September 2026