Recommendation to curtail Solar Bonus Scheme rejected by Qld govt

Published by

The Queensland government has ruled out making retrospective cuts to the state’s Solar Bonus Scheme, immediately after the measure was recommended in a report into driving down power prices.

The Queensland Productivity Commission’s Electricity Pricing Inquiry Draft Report, released on Wednesday, made 54 recommendations to government, including a review of its 50 per cent renewable energy target by 2030, and cutting short its Solar Bonus Scheme ahead of the planned 2028 closure.

“There are some elements of the report that will be immediately ruled out by this government because they do cut across election commitments we made to the people of Queensland,” Treasurer Curtis Pitt said.

The report – which was commissioned in April 2015, on the back of electricity price rises of more than 80 per cent since 2006/7 – also recommended the government commit to deregulation of retail power prices in the state’s south-east almost immediately.

The Productivity Commission said that price was “acting as a barrier to customers realising the benefits of innovation evident in other de-regulated markets.”

However, the Produtivity Commission, while acknowledging that most of the power price rises came from increased network charges, did not recommend major changes to network management, apart from supporting the consolidation of the two network – Ergon and Energex – into a bigger monopoly company.

It also “cautioned” against the adoption of new business models that reflect the adoption of new technology.

The QPC recommended the government should not intervene in the market to achieve its one million residential solar rooftops target, or the additional 3000MW of residential and commercial PV target, by 2020.

It said that, without intervention, the 3000MW amount had been projected to be met by 2022, two years later than the government’s target date.

The QPC also said it believed the Solar Bonus Scheme had done its job by stimulating the local industry and helping to make solar more affordable, and should therefore be considered early closure.

“The QPC estimates that by the middle of 2020, most participants will have recovered the costs of their systems,” there report said.

The report also claimed that the Solar Bonus Scheme had added around $89 to an average household bill and around 9 per cent for an average business customer in 2015-16.

On the Queensland government’s 50 per cent renewable energy target by 2020, the QPC said its modelling suggested an average increase in retail electricity prices of 0.5 per cent for households and 0.3 per cent for industry – and a reduction of 0.7 per cent for commercial customers – for the period 2015–16 to 2034–35 was required to meet the target.

“The report notes the benefits of a national approach rather than Queensland ‘going it alone’,” it said.

The report also recommended preparing regional Queensland for market competition, by encouraging more retail companies to the market.

The Palaszczuk government’s rapid-fire decision to rule out both the recommended early closure of the Solar Bonus Scheme and the review of the state’s RET has been welcomed by the renewables industry.

“The Queensland Government is absolutely right to rule out this crazy idea on day one,” said the Australian Solar Council in a statement on Wednesday.

“Queensland families made major investment decisions in good faith on the basis of government guaranteed contracts for the life of the Solar Bonus Scheme.

“The Productivity Commission is completely out of touch if it thinks it’s ok for the Government to tear up contracts with hundreds of thousands of Queenslanders.

“As we’ve demonstrated time and time again, the Solar Council will stop any attempt to retrospectively cut feed-in tariffs. This is a threshold issue,” the ASC said.

 

Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of One Step Off The Grid and deputy editor of its sister site, Renew Economy. She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

What comes after microgrids? Energy parks based around wind, solar and storage

Co-locating renewable generation, load and storage offers substantial benefits, particularly for manufacturing facilities and data…

31 December 2024

This talk of nuclear is a waste of time: Wind, solar and firming can clearly do the job

Australia’s economic future would be at risk if we stop wind and solar to build…

30 December 2024

Build it and they will come: Transmission is key, but LNP make it harder and costlier

Transmission remains the fundamental building block to decarbonising the grid. But the LNP is making…

23 December 2024

Snowy Hunter gas project hit by more delays and blowouts, with total cost now more than $2 billion

Snowy blames bad weather for yet more delays to controversial Hunter gas project, now expected…

23 December 2024

Happy holidays: We will be back soon

In 2024, Renew Economy's traffic jumped 50 per cent to more than 24 million page…

20 December 2024

Solar Insiders Podcast: A roller coaster year in review – and the keys to a smoother 2025

In our final episode for the year, SunWiz's Warwick Johnston on the highs and the…

20 December 2024