Categories: CommentarySolar

QCA lifts solar feed in tariff after RenewEconomy points out error

Published by

The Queensland Competition Authority is to revise its proposed feed in tariff affecting more than 30,000 solar households in the Ergon Energy network after conceding errors in its calculations pointed out by RenewEconomy on Monday.

RenewEconomy questioned why the QCA had decided to change its tariff from 6.53c/kWh to 6.03c/kWh. The QCA justified it on the basis of lower network losses. That could be valid, but in this case, the reduction of network losses, as RenewEconomy pointed out, simply hadn’t occurred to the extent claimed.

QCA chairman Malcolm Roberts rang RenewEconomy on Tuesday to say that there had been an “embarrassing” error in calculations. The feed in tariff would be revised to 6.348c/kWh. It will be formally announced later on Tuesday.

“It was  surprising to me that we might have got it wrong,” Roberts said. “To the extent that you helped identify the error, I would like to thank you.”

The tariff will still be lower than last year’s tariff, despite an increase in the wholesale price component.

As RenewEconomy pointed out, the cutting of the tariffs due to reduced network losses is ironic because it is distributed energy, including solar, which is helping reduce those losses, which often run at 10, and up to 15 per cent, according to the length of the network.

Still, RenewEconomy is glad it has helped save consumers money.

Ergon has 106,000 solar households in its network, with close to 400MW of capacity. Most are on the premium feed in tariffs which will be unchanged until 2029 (unless Ergon buys them out).

However, more than 30,000 households get the FiT set annually by the QCA. Based on their estimated capacity of 120MW on those homes each year, if they exported between half and two thirds of that output back to the grid, that is a saving of nearly $500,000 for those households.

Addendum: QCA later confirmed the revised tariffs and the proposed 6.348c/kWh.

Roberts said in a statement: “The QCA mistakenly used the wrong energy loss factor when calculating the new rate for 2015-16. When buying energy from household solar systems, retailers avoid paying for energy lost over the transmission and distribution system – the QCA believes the price retailers pay for solar energy should include that saving.

“Unfortunately, the tariff rate announced on Friday by the QCA applied the wrong loss factor, relating to larger business customers.

“This error was detected after queries from the editor of Renew Economy.”

 

 

 

 

 

Giles Parkinson

Giles Parkinson is founder and editor of Renew Economy, and of its sister sites One Step Off The Grid and the EV-focused The Driven. He is the co-host of the weekly Energy Insiders Podcast. Giles has been a journalist for more than 40 years and is a former deputy editor of the Australian Financial Review. You can find him on LinkedIn and on Twitter.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Australia’s biggest coal state breaks new ground in wind and solar output

New South Wales has reached two remarkable renewable energy milestones that signal the growing contribution…

6 January 2025

New Year begins with more solar records, as PV takes bigger bite out of coal’s holiday lunch

As 2025 begins, Victoria is already making its mark on the energy landscape with a…

3 January 2025

What comes after microgrids? Energy parks based around wind, solar and storage

Co-locating renewable generation, load and storage offers substantial benefits, particularly for manufacturing facilities and data…

31 December 2024

This talk of nuclear is a waste of time: Wind, solar and firming can clearly do the job

Australia’s economic future would be at risk if we stop wind and solar to build…

30 December 2024

Build it and they will come: Transmission is key, but LNP make it harder and costlier

Transmission remains the fundamental building block to decarbonising the grid. But the LNP is making…

23 December 2024

Snowy Hunter gas project hit by more delays and blowouts, with total cost now more than $2 billion

Snowy blames bad weather for yet more delays to controversial Hunter gas project, now expected…

23 December 2024