Policy & Planning

Our energy market was never fit for purpose, because it was obsessed only with price

Published by

The Energy Security Board and Australian Energy Market Operator are beginning to frame the design of our post-2025 electricity market.

This supposedly reflects the view that our present market design is “no longer” fit for purpose.

Let’s be clear: it was never ‘fit for purpose’ from the day the Victorian market began in the mid-1990s, followed by the National Electricity Market.

In 1992, the State Electricity Commission of Victoria published scenarios showing how iit could achieve a 20% reduction in emissions by 2005, using experience from its Demand Management Action Program and renewables: for example the SECV and Victorian Solar Council had installed our first ‘large’ grid- connected wind generator at Breamlea, near Geelong, in the mid-1980s.

Then the economic fundamentalists and ruthless asset sale experts took over when the Kennett government was elected in late 1992. Energy market design ignored demand-side action. Support for renewable energy was slashed.

The National Grid Management Council, tasked with design of the market, initially framed some reasonable objectives in 1992:

  • to encourage the most efficient, economical and environmentally sound development of the electricity industry consistent with key National and State policies and objectives;
  • to provide a framework for long-term;
    least cost solutions to meet future power supply demands including appropriate use of demand management;
  • to maintain and develop the technical, economic and environmental performance and/or utilisation of the power system.

But these were modified over time to exclude environment and focus on electricity prices not overall cost. They evolved into ‘economic’ objectives—actually short-term narrow financial objectives limited to energy supply.

The 2002 Parer Review identified problems with market design that have still not been fixed.

The Australian Energy Market Operator and Energy Security Board are doing some good work reframing future energy market design. But the barriers to fundamental change are challenging and deeply ingrained in energy culture.

    • Alan Pears is a senior industry fellow at RMIT University, advises a number of industry and community organisations and works as a consultant.Originally published on Renew Magazine. Reproduced with permission of the author.
Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Old king coal risks leaving Australia “in the dark” as aging power plants grow unreliable

New research reveals more than 60% of Australia’s remaining coal power fleet is more than…

23 January 2025

AEMC answers state’s call to use mothballed diesel plants for emergency summer back-up

A temporary energy market rule change will allow two mothballed diesel generators to be used…

23 January 2025

The devil of Frontier’s nuclear modelling is not in the detail, it’s in the omissions

Frontier's nuclear modelling poses a valuable question about the pace of decarbonisation and what we…

23 January 2025

New records for solar and coal underscore urgent energy challenge facing NSW

Australia's biggest coal state continues to reach new solar heights, but a different sort of…

23 January 2025

Transgrid locks in supplier of high-voltage transmission kit for HumeLink project

Transgrid has selected the supplier of more key components of its massive HumeLink project, the…

23 January 2025

Federal green bank gets $2 billion top-up to seize “big opportunities”

As Trump pulls the US out of the clean energy race, the Australian government moves…

23 January 2025