Policy & Planning

Our energy market was never fit for purpose, because it was obsessed only with price

Published by

The Energy Security Board and Australian Energy Market Operator are beginning to frame the design of our post-2025 electricity market.

This supposedly reflects the view that our present market design is “no longer” fit for purpose.

Let’s be clear: it was never ‘fit for purpose’ from the day the Victorian market began in the mid-1990s, followed by the National Electricity Market.

In 1992, the State Electricity Commission of Victoria published scenarios showing how iit could achieve a 20% reduction in emissions by 2005, using experience from its Demand Management Action Program and renewables: for example the SECV and Victorian Solar Council had installed our first ‘large’ grid- connected wind generator at Breamlea, near Geelong, in the mid-1980s.

Then the economic fundamentalists and ruthless asset sale experts took over when the Kennett government was elected in late 1992. Energy market design ignored demand-side action. Support for renewable energy was slashed.

The National Grid Management Council, tasked with design of the market, initially framed some reasonable objectives in 1992:

  • to encourage the most efficient, economical and environmentally sound development of the electricity industry consistent with key National and State policies and objectives;
  • to provide a framework for long-term;
    least cost solutions to meet future power supply demands including appropriate use of demand management;
  • to maintain and develop the technical, economic and environmental performance and/or utilisation of the power system.

But these were modified over time to exclude environment and focus on electricity prices not overall cost. They evolved into ‘economic’ objectives—actually short-term narrow financial objectives limited to energy supply.

The 2002 Parer Review identified problems with market design that have still not been fixed.

The Australian Energy Market Operator and Energy Security Board are doing some good work reframing future energy market design. But the barriers to fundamental change are challenging and deeply ingrained in energy culture.

    • Alan Pears is a senior industry fellow at RMIT University, advises a number of industry and community organisations and works as a consultant.Originally published on Renew Magazine. Reproduced with permission of the author.

Recent Posts

For First Nations communities, energy insecurity is not new. But the shift to renewables is more urgent than ever

In remote First Nations communities primarily reliant on diesel power stations, the steep price hikes…

10 April 2026

“An own goal that we don’t need:” Investor group sounds alarm over new tax on renewables

Investor group "dismayed" at draft reforms to the Capital Gains Tax it says will deter…

10 April 2026

“2 systems every 5 minutes:” Home battery records tumble as regulator issues fresh warning to installers

Newly minted leader of Australia's home battery market claims stunning new installation record, as regulator…

10 April 2026

Independent panel approves another big battery sent for review by long-distance haters

Independent regulator approves big battery proposed for next to a waste-water treatment plant, after it…

10 April 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Why wind projects are stalled at the gate

Large scale wind projects are not getting finance and are not getting built. CEIG's Richie…

10 April 2026

Fortescue fast-tracks “world’s first” large scale green grid to eliminate diesel and other fossil fuels

Fortescue fast tracks its plans to eliminate diesel and other fossil fuels, saying it will…

10 April 2026