Climate

“No offsets, no excuses:” The tiny handful of Australian companies aiming for real zero

Published by

Five years ago, companies of all shapes and sizes were setting net zero targets.

Reality has since caught up with a number of them, with Climate Integrity director Claire Snyder of the view some had little intention of ever following through on their promises.

“It’s very easy to set a net zero commitment target, it’s actually much harder to achieve it,” according to the head of the national advocacy organisation founded in 2024 to promote transparency, accountability and adherence to climate science.

Still, not all businesses are treating climate pledges as a marketing exercise.

Lendlease, IKEA and Fortescue have all been singled out by the not-for-profit research group for their “real zero” leadership, with the latter the only heavy-emitting industrial company in the world targeting no fossil fuels.

Distinct from “net zero”, which allows companies to neutralise emission by sinking money into growing trees and other carbon-cutting projects, “real zero” refers to decarbonisation through clean technologies – no offsets allowed.

Originally intended as a last-resort for sectors with no emissions-free tech options, offsets have since become a way for companies to make little effort to decarbonise while throwing money at green projects elsewhere.

While proponents argue offsets funnel funds into clean energy and revegetation, a host of reliability and permanence concerns have come to light and EnergyAustralia has recently been forced to apologise to customers for using them to spruik “carbon neutral” products.

For Ms Snyder, elevating climate leaders was pivotal at a time of ambition backsliding concentrated in the US where businesses are experiencing political and legal pressure to ditch environmental policies and activities.

While not entirely immune, she said Australian-based firms were able to create some distance and had produced fewer abandoned or watered-down climate commitments.

Lendlease head of sustainability Cate Harris said for her company, which has been chipping away at its decarbonisation targets for years, it was full-steam ahead.

“What sort of insulates us a little, particularly across our sector, is that the green building movement is now over 20 years old,” she told AAP.

The construction and real estate giant has an interim net zero carbon target by 2025 for scope 1 and 2 emissions, an offset-reliant commitment that is on track.

More ambitious is its long-term “absolute zero” plan, which will see the real estate giant eliminate emissions without offsets, including those produced in the making of building materials.

Cutting out what’s known as “embodied carbon” from steel, concrete, glass and aluminium remains a major challenge as it’s outside the company’s direct control and relies on suppliers investing in green production lines.

“They are actually probably four of the harder-to-abate sectors globally,” she said.

Ms Harris reported “green shoots” across all four materials and was confident the real estate company could meet its 2040 decarbonisation goals.

“No offsets, no excuses,” she said.

Ms Snyder said the corporate pursuit of emissions reductions remained a largely opt-in and voluntary affair, with the exception of the safeguard mechanism for big polluters.

Even that was dominated by offset use rather than actual decarbonisation, she said, and having “very low to moderate impact on emissions” based on the latest data.

She said regulatory regimes clamping down on greenwashing and climate information transparency should be compulsory. 

“Unless they’re mandatory, we’re not going to see the change that we need to see at the pace that we need to see it.”

Originally set up as a government-level commitment under the international Paris climate pact to limit warming to 1.5C or well below 2C, net zero was never intended to be adopted by corporations.

The pursuit of carbon neutrality by 2050 – that is, cutting emissions wherever possible and then countering sectors with no legitimate options for decarbonisation with reliable carbon dioxide removal strategies – is key to achieving Australia’s temperature goals.

Source: AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Northern Hemisphere extreme heat records just a warm up for the full El Niño theatre

We've seen impacts of the record-breaking El Niño in the Northern Hemisphere – including heat-related…

12 August 2026

The NSW koalas-for-coal shakedown – and what it reveals about the carbon offset market

The NSW government's plan for a Great Koala National Park now includes seeking the rights…

12 August 2026

NSW won’t rule out slippages to coal closure timetable, as first turbine deliveries highlight lack of new projects

NSW energy minister says government will make "hard decisions to extend" coal closures where required,…

12 August 2026

Why solar didn’t work for this dairy farmer, until he added a battery and put it on wheels

High hot water use, an unreliable grid, and milking in the dark were all challenges…

12 August 2026

Coal will close to schedule, says AGL, but to build more wind we need policy certainty in return

AGL says it will stick to its dates for coal plant closure, but wants policy…

12 August 2026

“No silver bullet:” Wind farms need site-specific technology to avoid bird and bat turbine collisions

No one system prevents bird and bat turbine collisions, but a mix of strategies from…

12 August 2026