Renewables

Morgan Stanley is wrong about Tesla’s electric cars

Published by

UCSUSA

Last week, investment bank Morgan Stanley was quoted as claiming electric vehicles are responsible for more global warming emissions than gasoline cars.

The firm’s report says Tesla isn’t a ‘green’ company because of this (incorrect) conclusion. There are likely plenty of reasons to invest in the electric car and solar panel maker, and certainly many reasons not to bet on Tesla, but the false claim of dirty cars isn’t one of them.

Why did Morgan Stanley get the wrong answer?

It’s hard to say because no underlying data is shown to back up Morgan Stanley’s assertions, so I can’t check their calculations. However, you are welcome to inspect ours; we wrote a report in 2015 comparing the emissions of electric cars and gasoline vehicles, and recently updated it with new electricity generation data.

What are the global warming emissions from electric cars?

The emissions that result from using an electric vehicle (EV) depend on part on where the vehicle is recharged, as electricity generation varies significantly across the United States.

Based on where EVs have been sold so far, the average electric car generates global warming emissions equal to a 73 MPG gasoline car. Overall, over two-thirds (70 percent) of Americans live where driving an electric car would result in lower global warming emissions than even a 50 MPG gasoline car.

Manufacturing emissions are small compared to savings during use

Even when considering the emissions from the manufacture of the EV’s battery, EVs over their lifespan result in significant global warming emissions savings. Over the lifetime of a car the size of the Tesla Model S, the emissions savings are about 53 percent, when compared to a similar gasoline car.

Electricity is getting cleaner, making EVs better over time

Very few details are given in the article about Morgan Stanley’s analysis, however one of the few statistics given (regarding the fraction of electricity from fossil fuel in the U.S.) is wrong.

Nationally, we currently derive about 65 percent of electricity from fossil fuel and only about 31 percent from coal, down from 50 percent in 2006.

Both fossil-fueled electricity and coal generation have declined substantially over the last decade, making driving EVs cleaner. And as we increase the amount of renewable electricity in the U.S., driving on electricity can be even cleaner.
Source: UCSUSA. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Build it and they will come: The urgent grid upgrades WA needs to quit coal and power green industry

Western Australia risks losing jobs and investment in its two most prized industrial regions without…

10 September 2026

Households tipped to spend $85 billion on energy upgrades, but renters and young Australians could miss out

Spending on home energy upgrades such as insulation and solar panels is on the rise…

9 September 2026

“Overlooked” challenge: Data centre boom could lift e-waste load 10-fold, increase “forever chemical” risks

Environmental authorities will be faced with a wave of new e-waste as data centre industry…

9 September 2026

“Australian first” grid-connected sodium-sulfur battery powers up, just as supplier halts production

Australia’s first grid-connected, industrial-scale sodium-sulfur battery will support materials processing plant and demonstrate novel long-duration…

9 September 2026

Massive and unprecedented injection of power as Super Battery tests its full shock-absorber capacity

Australia's most powerful battery injects a massive and unprecedented amount of power into the grid…

9 September 2026

Too old, can’t dance: New numbers show Yallourn is ready to retire

Report says Yallourn is old and clunky and ready to retire, and replacing it gas…

9 September 2026