Photo by RawFilm on Unsplash
Wind and solar technologies have extended their lead over fossil fuel generation on costs of new plant, and are now as cheap, or even cheaper, than existing coal, gas and nuclear power plants – even compared to existing and fully-depreciated fossil fuel generators.
These conclusions are made in the 12th edition of the annual Lazard Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis, which has become one of the major global industry benchmarks.
Its conclusions, both on the huge cost advantage of new wind and solar over new coal and gas plants, and now with existing gas plants – tallies with observations in Australia from the likes of Origin Energy, Snowy Hydro, AGL, Simec Zen’s Sanjeev Gupta, and any number of private analysis.
It should also give pause for thought for those – including the federal government – who want to design schemes that might encourage new investment in coal generators.
“We have reached an inflection point where, in some cases, it is more cost effective to build and operate new alternative energy projects than to maintain existing conventional generation plants,” says George Bilicic, the vice chairman and global head of Lazard’s Power, Energy & Infrastructure Group.
Lazard’s figures are based on US data and in US conditions, but give an insight into global trends. Over the past year, Lazard has seen a further 13 per cent fall in the cost of solar, and another 7 per cent fall in the cost of wind energy.
This has extended its big advantage over the cost of building new coal, nuclear, or even gas plants – even in the US where the cost of gas is well below that of Australia.
Lazard has also identified more significant cost declines in battery storage technologies in the 4th edition of the Levellised Cost of Storage report.
It cautions that while storage technology holds great promise, “alternative energy systems alone will not be capable of meeting the base-load generation needs of a developed economy for the foreseeable future.”
But it is important here to note that Lazard only canvasses the various battery storage technologies, and not the cost of storage of other technologies for longer durations such as solar thermal, pumped hydro, or even hydrogen.
Still, Lazard notes lithium-ion batteries remains the least expensive of the battery storage technologies, and continues to decrease in cost due to improved efficiencies and a maturing supply chain.
It sees further cost reductions of 28 per cent over the coming five years but warns of cost pressures from higher commodity pricing (e.g., cobalt and lithium carbonate) and tightening supply. This is where some of the mooted lithium and cobalt mining developments in Australia could play a key role.
A 500 MWh vanadium flow battery - the biggest in Australia - has been promised…
The growth of big battery projects - fuelled by falling costs and growing needs -…
A $230 million project investigating ways to make extracting future materials more sustainable will bring…
Australia’s electricity market is old, outdated and not doing enough to drive investment in the…
The company that employs the former Miss America spruiking nuclear in Australia has taken a…
Tesla's battery storage business had more than doubled in the past year, but will the…
