Is Germany’s solar auction model flawed?

Published by

Lenz Blog

I think that the 2014 reform of the German renewable energy law was a large step in the wrong direction. I think the auction model favored by that legislation over the feed-in tariff will be a failure.

I am also rather critical of the fact that the European Commission has had undue influence on that legislation, clearly overstepping their powers in a way not compatible with basic democratic values and the German Constitution.

So I noted with interest the failure of the first test case for the auction model. The auction price turned out to be above what the current feed-in tariff is, as this article at PV Magazine explains. Those first 154.97 MW will be built at €0.0917 per kWh, which is higher than the  current €0.0902 of the feed-in tariff.

But now comes the fun part. From the article:

Successful bidders now have 24 months to realize their PV projects. 

Guess what will happen in those two years with the cost of building solar projects? Might those come down even more?

The correct comparison would be to compare the result of the auction to whatever the market pays for projects finished two years from now, not to compare with projects already finished at today’s cost.

The feed-in tariff actually is an auction model, especially if it is built in a way that reacts to the amount of installations over a certain time period. That’s a point Craig Morris made last year. And the difference in efficiency between the feed-in tariff way of competition and the auction model is even more clear if you note the fact that these auctions were bidding on projects finished two years from now.

In contrast, feed-in tariffs are always paid only for installations already finished. If they could get paid at the rates of two years before their completion, the tariffs would be much higher.

In other news, March was another month of less than 100 MW new solar in Germany. That is about one quarter of what we had only two years ago.

If the goal of the 2014 reform was to keep coal in business longer and make sure that Germany doesn’t meet its climate targets, then congratulations, your strategy is a success.

This article was originally published here https://k.lenz.name/LB/?p=11090#sthash.Abct8gLf.dpuf. Reproduced with permission

Update: Figure changed to re-insert missing decimal point.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Expert committee to assist federal oversight of consumer energy resources

Energy ministers meeting details how the federal government plans to set and enforce standards for…

12 September 2026

Doctored photos, unsafe installs: Regulators continue crackdown on solar and energy rebate breaches

One solar company fined $100,000 for failing to have fall protection in place, another made…

11 September 2026

Large 900 MW battery and data centre planned at former nuclear power plant site

Huge battery and data centre proposed for nuclear power plant site in Germany, as renewables…

11 September 2026

Setting the standards: Why consumer energy resources deserve a better policy approach than “Ready, Fire, Aim”

Shortfalls in governance of consumer energy resources will be obvious - and potentially costly and…

11 September 2026

Energy ministers to look at rule change that could smash the solar ceiling, and plug renters into battery benefits

Solar Sharer opens up a new category of Australian prosumer – battery with no solar.…

11 September 2026

Rising sea levels threaten more than 267,000 properties – and the Sunshine State is on the front line

Rising seas and storm surges could cost Australia more than $855 billion, endangering homes, businesses,…

11 September 2026