Is Germany’s solar auction model flawed?

Published by

Lenz Blog

I think that the 2014 reform of the German renewable energy law was a large step in the wrong direction. I think the auction model favored by that legislation over the feed-in tariff will be a failure.

I am also rather critical of the fact that the European Commission has had undue influence on that legislation, clearly overstepping their powers in a way not compatible with basic democratic values and the German Constitution.

So I noted with interest the failure of the first test case for the auction model. The auction price turned out to be above what the current feed-in tariff is, as this article at PV Magazine explains. Those first 154.97 MW will be built at €0.0917 per kWh, which is higher than the  current €0.0902 of the feed-in tariff.

But now comes the fun part. From the article:

Successful bidders now have 24 months to realize their PV projects. 

Guess what will happen in those two years with the cost of building solar projects? Might those come down even more?

The correct comparison would be to compare the result of the auction to whatever the market pays for projects finished two years from now, not to compare with projects already finished at today’s cost.

The feed-in tariff actually is an auction model, especially if it is built in a way that reacts to the amount of installations over a certain time period. That’s a point Craig Morris made last year. And the difference in efficiency between the feed-in tariff way of competition and the auction model is even more clear if you note the fact that these auctions were bidding on projects finished two years from now.

In contrast, feed-in tariffs are always paid only for installations already finished. If they could get paid at the rates of two years before their completion, the tariffs would be much higher.

In other news, March was another month of less than 100 MW new solar in Germany. That is about one quarter of what we had only two years ago.

If the goal of the 2014 reform was to keep coal in business longer and make sure that Germany doesn’t meet its climate targets, then congratulations, your strategy is a success.

This article was originally published here https://k.lenz.name/LB/?p=11090#sthash.Abct8gLf.dpuf. Reproduced with permission

Update: Figure changed to re-insert missing decimal point.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

NSW responds to REZ inquiry recommendations as Barnaby Joyce dials up the anti-renewables rhetoric

The NSW government responds to an inquiry calling for better management of renewable energy zones…

2 November 2026

The utility, the almond farm, and the landmark renewable microgrid | Solar Insiders

We talk to the developers of one of Australia’s biggest, privately-owned non-mining microgrids, that will…

2 November 2026

“Electric jerry can:” Arena backs Aussie portable energy storage innovation that’s not quite a plug-in battery

Plans to manufacture portable, semi solid-state batteries in Melbourne, for use "at home or on…

2 November 2026

Major Australian super fund bets bigger on small solar and battery specialist

Australian industry super fund boosts its investment in the small solar and battery platform recently…

2 November 2026

“Forests on the moon:” Academics and green groups say proposed carbon credit reforms fall short

Reforms to Australia's carbon credits have divided an inquiry, with critics warning they will not…

2 November 2026

State utility backs “first hybridisation” with updated 10-year contract that adds battery storage to solar

Plans to add a four-hour big battery to an operational solar farm have been underwritten…

2 November 2026