Categories: CommentarySolar

How rooftop solar is changing Australia’s electricity demand patterns

Published by

With the inclusion of generation by rooftop solar, CEDEX will from now on give a more complete picture of electricity supply and consumption in the parts of Australia covered by the National Electricity Market.

Figure 1

While currently a small contributor to total supply (above), rooftop solar has been growing steadily and will undoubtedly continue to do so.

Moreover, data on electricity demand which CEDEX® has been reporting up till now excludes the consumption of electricity sourced from rooftop solar. Inclusion of rooftop solar on the demand side makes a material difference to the apparent trend in demand and thus helps to provide a better understanding of the factors driving changes in electricity demand.

Up till now, all data reported by CEDEX® has concerned activities at the transmission grid level of the electricity system. All generation has been by generators connected at the transmission level and participating in the NEM wholesale market.

Demand has been measured as the quantity of electricity sent out to the grid by these generators. Rooftop solar generators are not connected at this level and do not participate in the wholesale market. Instead, they are embedded within local distribution networks.

Some of the electrical energy generated is exported into the local network and contributes to the electricity being supplied, through the network, to other nearby electricity consumers. The remainder of the energy is termed behind the meter consumption; it is used on-site by the household or business hosting the rooftop solar installation and never enters the distribution network.

From the perspective of the distribution network operator there is an important difference between behind the meter consumption and electricity supplied to the network by rooftop solar. Behind the meter consumption appears as a reduction in demand by the customer and is indistinguishable, in general terms, from other sources of demand reduction, such as use of more efficient appliances or changes in consumer behaviour.

Electricity exported through the meter, on the other hand, is a completely new source of electricity supply to the network. The existing electricity distribution networks were designed and built for electrical energy to flow in one direction only, from the centre to the periphery. Needing to accommodate energy flowing in the opposite direction is now presenting technical and management challenges to distribution network businesses.

From the perspective of the operator of the whole grid system, i.e. AEMO, and of all the generators connected to the grid, all generation by rooftop solar looks like a reduction in demand, irrespective of whether the electricity is consumed behind the meter or exported to the local network.

The rooftop solar generation data which CEDEX® is now reporting also makes no distinction; it is the estimated total electrical energy output of rooftop solar installations across the NEM, including both behind the meter consumption and exports to the distribution network.

Finally, it is worth noting that rooftop solar is not the only source of generation embedded within distribution networks. AEMO estimates that other embedded generators, which it terms small non-scheduled generators, supplied 4.4 TWh in 2014-15, compared with 5.1 TWh generated by rooftop solar. However, this source of generation has been growing much more slowly than rooftop solar.

Generators in this group include both renewable and non-renewable generators, such as landfill gas and small hydro at irrigation dams (renewable) and gas fuelled cogeneration plants (non-renewable). Data on output from this group of generators is extremely sparse and it is most unlikely that they will ever be included in CEDEX®.

Figure 2

Total electricity generation in the year to September 2015 continued the steady growth of the past few months, but emissions were virtually unchanged. As was the case in August, the total coal share was also virtually unchanged, with a small increase in black coal generation offset by a small decrease in the higher emissions brown coal generation (Figure 2).

The total coal share of generation (excluding rooftop solar) in the year to September 2015 was 75.6%. The gas share fell, but only slightly, wind was almost unchanged and the hydro share increased slightly as both Hydro Tasmania and Snowy Hydro continued to gradually increase output back towards long term average levels.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Total demand again increased (Figure 3), driven entirely by the growth in Queensland (Figure 5), caused by the use of electricity in the production and pipeline transport of coal seam gas to the LNG plants at Gladstone. Demand in NSW was unchanged from August, while small increases were seen in Victoria, SA and Tasmania, again continuing the trend of the past few months. The gradual decline in WA continued.

The small increases in Victoria, SA and Tasmania may be attributable to the slightly colder winter in 2015, compared with 2014, in these three states. The monthly weather reviews published by the Bureau of Meteorology indicate that average daily minimum temperatures were markedly lower in June and July 2015, compared with the same months in 2014, though August 2015 had slightly higher average minima than August 2014.

This effect can be seen in Figure 6, which is unchanged from corresponding graph from last month’s CEDEX®, except that winter 2015 in WA has now been included. Note that in Victoria the higher demand from general consumers is masked by the large decrease caused by the Point Henry aluminium smelter closure. WA did not have a colder winter in 2015 than in 2014 and total winter demand was lower in 2015 than in 2014.

Overall, the picture of demand a few months ago was that it might be rebounding after several years of falling demand. Now, for the year to September 2015, it appears as if demand may in fact just be a levelling out in the NEM (excluding the large new demand from the Queensland coal seam gas industry) and starting a possible longer term fall in WA. Such a trend would imply a continuing decrease in demand for electricity per capita and per dollar of GDP, though at a smaller rate than seen over the past few years.

Figure 5

 

Figure 6
Figure 6

 

 

 

 

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Australia’s biggest coal state breaks new ground in wind and solar output

New South Wales has reached two remarkable renewable energy milestones that signal the growing contribution…

6 January 2025

New Year begins with more solar records, as PV takes bigger bite out of coal’s holiday lunch

As 2025 begins, Victoria is already making its mark on the energy landscape with a…

3 January 2025

What comes after microgrids? Energy parks based around wind, solar and storage

Co-locating renewable generation, load and storage offers substantial benefits, particularly for manufacturing facilities and data…

31 December 2024

This talk of nuclear is a waste of time: Wind, solar and firming can clearly do the job

Australia’s economic future would be at risk if we stop wind and solar to build…

30 December 2024

Build it and they will come: Transmission is key, but LNP make it harder and costlier

Transmission remains the fundamental building block to decarbonising the grid. But the LNP is making…

23 December 2024

Snowy Hunter gas project hit by more delays and blowouts, with total cost now more than $2 billion

Snowy blames bad weather for yet more delays to controversial Hunter gas project, now expected…

23 December 2024