How much ‘easy PV’ could Japan build?

Published by

Renewables International

In 2012, Japan introduced a feed-in tariff for solar power, with the goal of kick-starting its relatively dormant PV market. So far the policy appears to be succeeding, and Japan is experiencing the onset of a solar boom. This opens the door for inspirational questions like: How much “easy PV” could be installed?

Thomas Gerke

“Easy PV” is solar power that can be integrated into the grid without leading to “negative” residual load. For the sake of the “easy PV” argument, we’ll ignore that Japan is home to the wordls largest existing grid-level storage capacity in the form of 25 GW of pumped hydro.

High peak summer demand

Japan is a great nation for solar power. It has more sunshine than Germany (that’s an easy one, I admit), it has densely packed urban areas and a domestic solar industry with a very long tradition. Most importantly, its electricity demand usually peaks during the summer around noon. The Japanese record for peak summer demand occurred on July 24th 2001; it stands at 182.7 GW.

Such extremely high levels are, however, very rare. The Japanese Federation of Electric Power Companies says that today’s peak demand is reached a “mere” 147.5 GW, more than twice the average German peak summer demand of 65-70 GW.

Huge “easy PV” potential

So let us assume that we want solar to peak at maximum of 120 GW, leaving a comfortable margin for hydro & other must-run-units and making it relatively easy to integrate PV into the grid.

Experience in Germany has shown that even on very sunny days the cumulated PV output peaks at approx. 70% of the installed capacity because PV systems face the sun in different angles and have different insolation conditions across the country. Japan could then install about 170 GW of PV.

In a relatively sunny country like Japan a PV capacity of 170 GW would produce at least approx. 180-200 TWh of electricity every year, enough to supply approx. 20% of Japans electricity mix with secure domestic renewable energy.

That would be quite a big chunk and in many ways a far better choice than relying on imported fuel oil and LNG to generate 60% of the nation’s electricity (40% before the nuclear crisis began).

 

Source: Renewables International. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

“It’s time to switch it on:” How to unlock a commercial rooftop PV power station equal to 10 coal plants

Months-long grid connection delays and costs that up to six times higher than originally quoted…

3 August 2026

Green bank targets small solar hybrids and battery retrofits in new $100 million package as mega projects stall

New CEFC funding campaign focuses on small solar hybrids and battery retrofits, which can be…

3 August 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: A battery with every wind turbine

Goldwind's John Titchen explains why and how all new wind turbines could come with their…

31 July 2026

Origin reports big dip in gas sales, as demand falls and batteries grab more of energy mix

Australia’s biggest energy retailer reports significant dip in gas sales, as customer demand falls and…

31 July 2026

Two coal state energy ministers come face to face and present wildly different visions of the future

The energy ministers of Australia's two most coal dependent states come face to face. One…

31 July 2026

Labor’s flagship renewable energy scheme has not worked: It’s time to replace the CIS with a CFD

The CIS has not worked. But the capacity it was designed to procure is needed…

31 July 2026