“What has been missing from the emergence of this “decentralized” energy system – which will ultimately turn the current centralised economic model on its head – has been concrete action at community level….this is now starting to change rapidly.” – RenewEconomy, March 10, 2015
Here’s what a few friends and I managed to achieve in the Mount Alexander Shire (pop. 18,400) in central Victoria in the latter half of 2014.
In June, we established the not-for-profit Hub Foundation Castlemaine as a vehicle for action on climate change. Shortly after, we launched the Mount Alexander Solar Homes (or MASH+) project. The project offered householders a quality solar system and a plus: an energy efficiency voucher for redeeming at a local environment shop, an energy assessment in the home and, after 100 systems were installed, a free system on a community building.
We employed a `green’ marketing person to help design and implement a marketing plan. We then quickly signed up local partners, including the Shire Council, the local paper, the IGA, a real estate agency, and around 20 other smaller businesses and community groups. We didn’t ask for money; they only had to display our posters in the window, put leaflets on counters and, in the case of the community organisations, run publicity in their newsletters.
The launch was a simple, outdoors affair attended by the Mayor and 20 or so people involved in renewables in the region. To its credit, the paper ran a two page spread –including a great photo – which attracted a lot of attention.
A few days later, two information evenings were held in the Town Hall, with the Mayor presiding at both. Around 150 enthusiastic people attended and many signed up on the spot. A week later similar well-attended meetings were held in the nearby towns of Maldon and Campbells Creek, with Council again providing halls and refreshments free of charge.
At the same time we ran prominent adverts in local papers, distributed a flyer to around 80% of letterboxes in the Shire, developed a racy, informative website and put large colourful banners on the Town Hall and another prominent local building.
The local paper also welcomed my offer to write a weekly 500 word column titled Solar Matters over the 10 week marketing period. Several thousand people were thereby introduced to the news from Renew and other sources and encouraged to think about solar for their own house.
After two months of intensive marketing, we had 360 expressions of interest to pass over to the installer we had appointed. 200 installations took place over the following six months. As houses and renovations are completed over the next few months, the final total is expected to rise to around 225.
Whilst the number who finally committed was a bit lower than we expected, the outcome has been very encouraging given the paid and voluntary effort involved. The project accounted for an impressive 65% of total installations in the last four months of the year and the percentage of houses with solar in the Shire has risen from 18% at the end of 2013 to 24% today.
As a result, the Shire is equal second in the solar stakes in Victorian LGAs. Only Indigo Shire, which contains the very green areas of Yackandandah and Beechworth, with 28% of houses with rooftop solar, is ahead of us.
Incidentally, it appears from comparing CER data with our installation numbers that virtually all the installations were additional; we weren’t merely cannibalising installations which would have taken place anyway. Our customers people needed much more than a phone call from India before making the decision to go solar.
Currently a new MASH Stage 1.1 is being rolled out to the 100 or so households which signed up after the MASH 1 closing date. This is expected to result in another 60 households going solar.
In May we plan to get really serious again and launch Stage 2 with all that we have learned from earlier stages taken on board. By early 2016 we expect to raise the percentage of solar households to the Indigo level. After that, we’ll be aiming for 50% by 2018.
The marketing and admin costs for MASH 1, up to the point of handing details over to the installer, were around $20,000. This amounted to around $2 per tonne of carbon avoided. Future stages should cost much less as we learn from our mistakes.
In MASH 1 we didn’t claw back any money at all as we had some philanthropic seed funding. From now on, however, we are putting ourselves on a more sustainable footing by earning an average of $200 from each installation. As a result, MASH 2 should bring in enough to cover our costs and leave a bit for next time.
The biggest source of discontent amongst customers has been the high costs of inspection and the rejigging of the meter for the feed-in-tariff. Origin’s oft- repeated statement that this may cost up to $765 gets a lot of people worried, especially when that’s added to the $200 the installer must pay his own inspector. It’s one of the barriers to solar which needs reform.
And the essential 10 learnings from the project?
We now want to freely share our experience and learnings with other organisations keen to run solar bulk-buys. Go to: hubfoundation.org.au
Neil Barrett is director of The Hub Foundation
The burden of a dying gas industry must be shared proportionately between network investors, governments,…
A newly approved big battery project faced just one, detailed objection, and it was able…
Australia's first privately funded residential VPP believes virtual power plants are easier to sell when…
Waste-to-energy incinerators should not be called clean, renewable, or low emission because they are as…
One of biggest solar contractors in Australia has lodged a major claim against Shell Energy…
Australia remains extraordinarily dependent on imported diesel to move freight and support much of its…