European utility shareholders lost half a trillion euros in five years

Published by

European utility shareholders lost half a trillion euros in five years, says this article (without byline) at the Economist. I found it because of this Retweet by Danny Kennedy.

As the article explains, the 20 biggest power companies in Europe had a collective value of $1 trillion at their peak in 2008, and they are worth “only” $500 billion now. And Germany’s biggest utility E-On has managed to beat that trend by declining a full three quarters in value.

The article blames this development partly on renewable energy. They are right, of course. With much more renewable energy in the mix, the days of guaranteed profit from fossil fuel and nuclear are gone.

E-On could have saved themselves a lot of this trouble if they had invested aggressively in renewable energy in Germany themselves. That investment came (and still comes) with a guaranteed profit for twenty years. That would have accelerated their problems with their existing fossil fuel and nuclear capacity. But the transition to renewable will happen anyway. Delaying it will always be a negative strategy helping only for a short-time period (which is a couple of decades, when discussing energy).

The most interesting part of this article was:

Some utilities have got into the renewables business themselves. Drax, which used to be Britain’s largest coal-fired power station, is being converted to run on wood pellets. Other utilities are big investors in offshore wind power.

That’s interesting because it shows the way ahead with existing fossil fuel plants. There is nothing wrong with running a coal plant, if you run it either on wood pellets (the first time I heard someone doing that), or on synthetic coal made from modern biomass, as Suncoal wants to do. There’s nothing wrong with running a gas plant if you fire hydrogen that has been produced from excessive solar or wind energy.

Under the present German Law on the Priority for Renewable Energy, it is not possible to run most of the coal power plants because under Article 27 of the law, feed-in tariffs are paid only for very small capacity plants. That should change. These existing coal plants need to move to biomass eventually anyway. Why not have it happen faster?

This article was originally published on CleanTechnica. Reproduced with permission
Read more at https://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/15/european-utility-shareholders-lost-half-trillion-euro-five-years/#veFJvbrRrGJwsx1P.99

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Cows and cyclones: New push to design solar farms for cattle and climate, but is Australia ready?

Companies are looking again at how to put more farmland under solar without disrupting operations…

5 November 2026

Data centre probe prompts call for tighter renewable energy requirements in coal state

A NSW parliamentary inquiry has recommended the government require data centres to supply their own…

5 November 2026

Low-cost green hydrogen hopeful lands fresh grant to build pilot at site of proposed offshore wind hub

Green hydrogen CSIRO spin-off wins new grant funding to build fourth pilot plant, this time…

5 November 2026

The rise and fall of the LGC market and the data centre policy decision that will determine its fate

A seemingly niche decision around data centre standards will determine whether LGC prices retain some…

5 November 2026

Huge wind and battery project avoids turbine cuts and name change to win state approval for the West

Developer dodges having to cut 18 turbines from its 750 MW wind plans and change…

5 November 2026

State tightens reins on home energy saver loans after signing up 15,000 households in just 5 months

Energy efficiency is so hot right now. After signing up more than 15,000 households to…

5 November 2026