Markets

Electricity sector “gold plating” behind sky-high prices – not renewables

Published by

Another major new report has confirmed that the “gold-plating” by Australia’s privatised electricity networks has been a key driver of an almost 200 per cent rise in electricity prices, that has been costing the nation’s households up to $500 a year.

The report, published by The Australia Institute on Thursday, is just the latest in a raft of papers and studies trying to peel back the layers of the nation’s soaring power prices. It is also the latest to say that the effect of the renewable energy target – and Australia’s short-lived carbon price – has been negligible.

The report reveals that the cost of electricity in Australia has increased by a whopping 183 per cent over the past 20 years, pushing up power prices at almost three times the rate of the national consumer price index, as you can see in the chart below.

“In those figures,” it adds, “the carbon price was barely noticeable.”

As the TAI notes, this 1996 – 2016 period happens to coincide with the time during which the “privatisation, corporatisation and marketisation” of Australia’s electricity sector was taking place – a shift that has led to a “blow-out” in management and salespeople.

“Electricity now employs an army of sales and marketing and other workers who do not actually make electricity,” the report says.

“In addition the reforms seemed to encourage profit gauging on the part of companies in the industry who are able to inflate the asset base used in calculating the permitted return on assets.”

This rather oblique statement seems to touch on the kind of strategic discounting practices being used by powerful incumbent “gen-tailers”, that have frustrated smaller retail players like Energy Locals founder Adrain Merrick.

“The fact that an essential service in Australia can carry a discount between bugger all and approaching half price – given the ‘secret cupboard’ offers that retailers offer customers when they look like leaving – would be laughable if it wasn’t hurting customers so much,” Merrick told RE just this week.

David Richardson, a senior research fellow at TAI and author of the Electric Costs report, echoes Merrick’s concerns.

“Electricity sells itself. People think it’s bizarre that electricity companies hire a sales staff and marketing people which then adds to the costs they charge us for buying something we have to buy,” he said.

“Then they pad their costs with returns on notional capital.”

As the report explains, this idea of “notional capital” is a sort of “weird circular process in which high rates of return are capitalised in ‘goodwill’ and other fictitious or notional items while high profits guarantee high retained earnings which also feed into the asset base.”

In that way, the report continues, “the unproductive capital base is allowed to increase and we are charged for capital that has no real function in producing electricity.”

It is confusing, particularly for the average consumer, who TAI says, when surveyed, tend to blame the electricity providers themselves for power price hikes.

Others, of course, might put the blame on the rise of renewable energy generation in Australia, if they believe the relentless campaigning of various prominent members of the Coalition government, not least its previous leader, Tony Abbott.

“A host of factors have been blamed for the increase in electricity prices relative to other prices,” the TAI report acknowledges. “But we would point out that the main departure from the rest of the price
index (pictured in the chart above) happened post privatisation and corporatisation.

“Too often we assume that private and corporatised state-owned corporations are operating efficiently. In the real world such as in the Australian economy where the checks and balances are imperfect and companies exercise considerable power,” it says.

“The report The Australia Institute has released today shows that a major factor (driving up electricity prices) is the gold-plating of financial services by private electricity companies are being paid for by consumers to the tune of four-to-five hundred dollars a year per household,” said TAI’s Ben Oquist.

“(The) process in which high rates of profits are used to ‘gold plate’ the financial asset base – without even improving the ability to generate electricity – is leading to higher prices for consumers,” he said.

Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of One Step Off The Grid and deputy editor of its sister site, Renew Economy. She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Call to include electrification in expanded small scale solar scheme to help households dump gas

Calls for federal government to revamp the national rooftop solar rebate, instead of killing it…

2 December 2024

Pressure mounts on NSW to follow on solar switch-off mechanism, in new warning on minimum load

New AEMO report details why all Australian states and territories should have an emergency solar…

2 December 2024

Climate damage: Australia faces $7 trillion hit to standard of living

Australia's living standards are forecast to take a $7 trillion hit between now and 2050,…

2 December 2024

A sneak preview of Peter Dutton’s nuclear costings

Any day now, we should be provided with an estimate on what Peter Dutton's plan…

2 December 2024

The four big takeaways from Australia’s latest climate assessments

Two sectors have been doing the bulk of the effort when it comes to emissions…

2 December 2024

Generators clash over Vales Point cash demand, but small retailers say they are the real victims

Dispute emerges over Vales Point demand for fast ruling on using cash as credit after…

2 December 2024